Suppr超能文献

吸烟行为中改变过程与阶段转变的关系:跨理论模型的两年纵向测试

The relation between processes-of-change and stage-transition in smoking behavior: a two-year longitudinal test of the Transtheoretical Model.

作者信息

Callaghan Russell C, Herzog Thaddeus A

机构信息

Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, 33 Russell Street, Toronto, ON, Canada M5S 2S1.

出版信息

Addict Behav. 2006 Aug;31(8):1331-45. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2005.10.011. Epub 2005 Dec 6.

Abstract

AIMS

To test the theoretical predictions of the Transtheoretical Model regarding process-use and progressive stage-transition in relation to smoking behavior.

DESIGN AND SETTING

Secondary data analyses of a 2-year longitudinal worksite-based smoking-cessation study [Working Well Trial (Abrams, D., Boutwell, W., Grizzle, J., Heimendinger, J., Sorensen, G., & Varnes, J. (1994). Cancer control at the workplace: The Working Well trial. Preventative Medicine, 23, 15-27)].

FINDINGS

The results demonstrated some support for the predictions generated from the Model: those making the transition from the Precontemplation stage to the Contemplation stage showed a heightened use of experiential processes-of-change from the baseline measurement to the 2-year follow-up, while those remaining in the Precontemplation stage reported no differences across time in their ratings of experiential and behavioral processes-of-change. Contrary to Transtheoretical Model's claims, however, smokers moving from the Contemplation stage to the Preparation stage over the 2-year period did not manifest an increasing use of experiential or behavioral processes over time in comparison to their counterparts remaining in the Contemplation stage.

CONCLUSIONS

Given the lack of longitudinal relation between process-use and the Contemplation-to-Preparation transition, the findings in this paper undermine the Transtheoretical Model's central tenet that stage-matched processes-of-change serve as the primary mechanisms of stage progression from the Contemplation stage to the Preparation stage.

摘要

目的

检验跨理论模型关于吸烟行为中过程使用和渐进阶段转变的理论预测。

设计与背景

对一项基于工作场所的为期两年的戒烟纵向研究[工作良好试验(艾布拉姆斯,D.,布特韦尔,W.,格里兹尔,J.,海明丁格,J.,索伦森,G.,& 瓦恩斯,J.(1994年)。工作场所的癌症控制:工作良好试验。预防医学,23,15 - 27)]进行二次数据分析。

研究结果

结果为该模型产生的预测提供了一些支持:那些从沉思前期阶段转变到沉思阶段的人,从基线测量到两年随访期间,体验性改变过程的使用有所增加,而那些仍处于沉思前期阶段的人在体验性和行为性改变过程的评分上随时间没有差异。然而,与跨理论模型的主张相反,在两年期间从沉思阶段转变到准备阶段的吸烟者,与仍处于沉思阶段的同龄人相比,随着时间推移并没有表现出体验性或行为性过程使用的增加。

结论

鉴于过程使用与沉思阶段到准备阶段的转变之间缺乏纵向关系,本文的研究结果削弱了跨理论模型的核心信条,即阶段匹配的改变过程是从沉思阶段到准备阶段阶段进展的主要机制。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验