Suppr超能文献

社区获得性肺炎影像学表现的可靠性及其与病原体的关系。

Reliability of radiographic findings and the relation to etiologic agents in community-acquired pneumonia.

作者信息

Boersma Wim G, Daniels Johannes M A, Löwenberg Alfred, Boeve Willem-Jan, van de Jagt Eric J

机构信息

Medical Center Alkmaar, Respiratory Diseases, Wilhelminalaan 12, 1815 JD Alkmaar, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Respir Med. 2006 May;100(5):926-32. doi: 10.1016/j.rmed.2005.06.018. Epub 2005 Dec 6.

Abstract

In a clinical setting the chest radiograph is the reference standard in establishing the diagnosis of community-acquired pneumonia (CAP). This study aimed to assess interobserver reliability (IR) of radiographic findings and the relationship to different causative pathogens in CAP. Chest radiographs of 192 patients with pneumonia, obtained from a database, were reviewed by 2 radiologists and 1 respiratory physician without specific clinical information. Main pattern of infiltrate, extent of pneumonia, presence of pleural fluid, thickened bronchial walls, lymphadenopathy and air bronchogram were scored. Also, the involved lobes were identified. Sputum cultures, blood cultures and serological tests were performed to identify the causative pathogen. IR was poor (kappa <0.4) for determining the main pattern of infiltrate and presence of air bronchogram, lymphadenopathy and thickening of bronchial walls. IR was fair to good (kappa 0.4-0.7) or even excellent (kappa>0.7) for determining the presence of pleural effusion, the extent of pneumonia and for identifying the lobes involved. Mycoplasma pneumoniae was associated more often with patchy alveolar opacities than Streptococcus pneumoniae (P=0.05). Chlamydia spp. were associated with unilobar involvement (86%), especially when compared to M. Pneumoniae (P=0.03) and S. pneumoniae (P=0.004). In conclusion, simple features such as presence of pleural fluid, the extent of pneumonia and identifying the involved lobes show fair to excellent IR. Other features such as main pattern of infiltrate are difficult to assess and show poor IR. Hardly any relation between different pathogens and radiological features was found. Therefore, chest radiographs are of limited value in predicting the causative pathogen, but are of good use to determine the extent of pneumonia and to detect complications such as parapneumonic effusion.

摘要

在临床环境中,胸部X光片是确立社区获得性肺炎(CAP)诊断的参考标准。本研究旨在评估影像学表现的观察者间可靠性(IR)以及与CAP中不同致病病原体的关系。从数据库中获取的192例肺炎患者的胸部X光片由2名放射科医生和1名呼吸内科医生在无具体临床信息的情况下进行回顾。对浸润的主要模式、肺炎范围、胸腔积液的存在、支气管壁增厚、淋巴结病和气支气管征进行评分。此外,确定受累肺叶。进行痰培养、血培养和血清学检测以鉴定致病病原体。在确定浸润的主要模式、气支气管征、淋巴结病和支气管壁增厚的存在方面,IR较差(kappa<0.4)。在确定胸腔积液的存在、肺炎范围和识别受累肺叶方面,IR为中等至良好(kappa 0.4 - 0.7)甚至优秀(kappa>0.7)。肺炎支原体比肺炎链球菌更常与斑片状肺泡实变相关(P = 0.05)。衣原体属与单叶受累相关(86%),特别是与肺炎支原体(P = 0.03)和肺炎链球菌(P = 0.004)相比。总之,诸如胸腔积液的存在、肺炎范围和识别受累肺叶等简单特征显示出中等至优秀的IR。其他特征如浸润的主要模式难以评估且IR较差。几乎未发现不同病原体与放射学特征之间的关系。因此,胸部X光片在预测致病病原体方面价值有限,但在确定肺炎范围和检测诸如肺炎旁胸腔积液等并发症方面很有用。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验