de Lusignan S
St George's Hospital Medical School, London, UK.
Med Inform Internet Med. 2005 Jun;30(2):89-97. doi: 10.1080/14639230500298651.
Clinical coding is variable in UK general practice. The reasons for this remain undefined. This review explains why there are no readily available alternatives to recording structured clinical data and reviews the barriers to recording structured clinical data. Methods used included a literature review of bibliographic databases, university health informatics departments, and national and international medical informatics associations. The results show that the current state of development of computers and data processing means there is no practical alternative to coding data. The identified barriers to clinical coding are: the limitations of the coding systems and terminologies and the skill gap in their use; recording structured data in the consultation takes time and is distracting; the level of motivation of primary care professionals; and the priority within the organization. A taxonomy is proposed to describe the barriers to clinical coding. This can be used to identify barriers to coding and facilitate the development of strategies to overcome them.
在英国的全科医疗中,临床编码存在差异。其原因尚不明晰。本综述解释了为何在记录结构化临床数据方面没有现成的替代方法,并审视了记录结构化临床数据的障碍。所采用的方法包括对书目数据库、大学健康信息学部门以及国家和国际医学信息学协会进行文献综述。结果表明,计算机和数据处理的当前发展状况意味着对数据进行编码没有实际的替代方法。已确定的临床编码障碍包括:编码系统和术语的局限性及其使用方面的技能差距;在诊疗过程中记录结构化数据既耗时又会分散注意力;基层医疗专业人员的积极性水平;以及组织内部的优先级。提出了一种分类法来描述临床编码的障碍。这可用于识别编码障碍并促进克服这些障碍的策略的制定。