Palla A, Bockisch C J, Bergamin O, Straumann D
Department of Neurology, Zurich University Hospital, Zurich, Switzerland.
J Neurophysiol. 2006 Apr;95(4):2222-32. doi: 10.1152/jn.01014.2005. Epub 2005 Dec 7.
In stationary head roll positions, the eyes are cyclodivergent. We asked whether this phenomenon can be explained by a static hysteresis that differs between the eyes contra- (CE) and ipsilateral (IE) to head roll. Using a motorized turntable, healthy human subjects (n = 8) were continuously rotated about the earth-horizontal naso-occipital axis. Starting from the upright position, a total of three full rotations at a constant velocity (2 degrees/s) were completed (acceleration = 0.05 degrees/s2, velocity plateau reached after 40 s). Subjects directed their gaze on a flashing laser dot straight ahead (switched on 20 ms every 2 s). Binocular three-dimensional eye movements were recorded with dual search coils that were modified (wires exiting inferiorly) to minimize torsional artifacts by the eyelids. A sinusoidal function with a first and second harmonic was fitted to torsional eye position as a function of torsional whole body position at constant turntable velocity. The amplitude and phase of the first harmonic differed significantly between the two eyes (paired t-test: P < 0.05): on average, counterroll amplitude of IE was larger [CE: 6.6 +/- 1.6 degrees (SD); IE: 8.1 +/- 1.7 degrees), whereas CE showed more position lag relative to the turntable (CE: 12.5 +/- 10.7 degrees; IE: 5.1 +/- 8.7 degrees). We conclude that cyclodivergence observed during static ocular counterroll is mainly a result of hysteresis that depends on whether eyes are contra- or ipsilateral to head roll. Static hysteresis also explains the phenomenon of residual torsion, i.e., an incomplete torsional return of the eyes when the first 360 degrees whole body rotation was completed and subjects were back in upright position (extorsion of CE: 2.0 +/- 0.10 degrees; intorsion of IE: 1.4 +/- 0.10 degrees). A computer model that includes asymmetric backlash for each eye can explain dissociated torsional hysteresis during quasi-static binocular counterroll. We hypothesize that ocular torsional hysteresis is introduced at the level of the otolith pathways because the direction-dependent torsional position lag of the eyes is related to the head roll position and not the eye position.
在头部静止滚动位置时,双眼呈旋转散开状态。我们探究了这种现象是否可以由双眼相对于头部滚动的对侧眼(CE)和同侧眼(IE)之间存在差异的静态滞后现象来解释。使用电动转盘,让8名健康人类受试者围绕地球水平鼻枕轴持续旋转。从直立位置开始,以恒定速度(2度/秒)总共完成三次完整旋转(加速度 = 0.05度/秒²,40秒后达到速度平稳期)。受试者将目光对准正前方闪烁的激光点(每2秒闪烁20毫秒)。使用经过改良(电线从下方引出)的双搜索线圈记录双眼三维眼动,以尽量减少眼睑产生的扭转伪影。在转盘速度恒定时,将带有一次谐波和二次谐波的正弦函数拟合到扭转眼位与扭转全身位置的函数关系上。两只眼睛的一次谐波的幅度和相位存在显著差异(配对t检验:P < 0.05):平均而言,同侧眼的反向滚动幅度更大[对侧眼:6.6 ± 1.6度(标准差);同侧眼:8.1 ± 1.7度],而对侧眼相对于转盘表现出更大的位置滞后(对侧眼:12.5 ± 10.7度;同侧眼:5.1 ± 8.7度)。我们得出结论,静态眼反向滚动期间观察到的旋转散开主要是滞后现象的结果,这取决于眼睛是相对于头部滚动的对侧还是同侧。静态滞后现象也解释了残余扭转现象,即当完成360度全身首次旋转且受试者回到直立位置时眼睛扭转不完全恢复的现象(对侧眼外旋:2.0 ± 0.10度;同侧眼内旋:1.4 ± 0.10度)。一个为每只眼睛包含不对称齿隙的计算机模型可以解释准静态双眼反向滚动期间分离的扭转滞后现象。我们推测眼扭转滞后现象是在耳石通路水平引入的,因为眼睛方向依赖性的扭转位置滞后与头部滚动位置相关,而非与眼睛位置相关。