Hayek Salim Michel, Paige Brittany, Girgis Girgis, Kapural Leonardo, Fattouh Maher, Xu Meng, Stanton-Hicks Michael, Mekhail Nagy A
Department of Pain Management, The Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, OH 44195, USA.
Clin J Pain. 2006 Jan;22(1):82-9. doi: 10.1097/01.ajp.0000151872.97148.f6.
Tunneled epidural catheters are often used to control pain and facilitate rehabilitation in patients with regional pain syndromes. A cohort retrospective study design was undertaken to evaluate the risk of catheter-related infection in patients who underwent a TEC placement to manage their chronic noncancer regional pain over a 5-year period.
There were 260 tunneled epidural catheters placed in 218 patients accounting for a total of 10,985 catheter-days. Of these, 230 catheters were placed in patients with neuropathic pain (90% of whom had complex regional pain syndrome) and 30 catheters in patients with somatic pain.
There were 24 epidural space infections in symptomatic patients, 23 of whom were in the neuropathic pain group-22 had complex regional pain syndrome. Additionally, tunneled epidural catheters had to be discontinued in 34 patients because of superficial infection or suspicion of infection; 33 of these were in the neuropathic pain group. The differences in the infection rates were significantly higher in the neuropathic pain group compared to the somatic group. When analyzed to an infection index per 1,000 catheter-days, the rate of infection rate was 5.51 for the patients with neuropathic pain and 2.43 for the patients with somatic pain. The rates for deep and superficial infections were 2.26 and 3.25, respectively, per 1000 catheter-days for the neuropathic pain group compared to 1.22 for both deep and superficial infections in the patients with somatic pain. There were 6 frank epidural abscesses upon contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging examinations of the spine, 1 epidural phlegmon and 2 patients displayed mild or questionable epidural enhancement on magnetic resonance imaging, suggestive of epidural inflammation. All these magnetic resonance imaging abnormalities were detected in patients with complex regional pain syndrome. Two of the patients with epidural abscesses underwent surgical exploration and drainage of the epidural abscess, though no neurologic deficits were observed in any of the patients.
The higher risk of tunneled epidural catheter infection observed in patients with neuropathic pain (particularly complex regional pain syndrome) warrants further study.
隧道式硬膜外导管常用于控制区域疼痛综合征患者的疼痛并促进康复。本研究采用队列回顾性研究设计,评估在5年期间接受隧道式硬膜外导管(TEC)置入以治疗慢性非癌性区域疼痛的患者发生导管相关感染的风险。
218例患者共置入260根隧道式硬膜外导管,总计10985导管日。其中,230根导管置入神经性疼痛患者(90%患有复杂性区域疼痛综合征),30根导管置入躯体性疼痛患者。
有症状患者发生24例硬膜外腔感染,其中23例在神经性疼痛组,22例患有复杂性区域疼痛综合征。此外,34例患者因浅表感染或疑似感染而不得不拔除隧道式硬膜外导管;其中33例在神经性疼痛组。神经性疼痛组的感染率差异显著高于躯体性疼痛组。按每1000导管日的感染指数分析,神经性疼痛患者的感染率为5.51,躯体性疼痛患者为2.43。神经性疼痛组每1000导管日的深部和浅表感染率分别为2.26和3.25,而躯体性疼痛患者的深部和浅表感染率均为1.22。脊柱对比增强磁共振成像检查发现6例明确的硬膜外脓肿、1例硬膜外蜂窝织炎,2例患者在磁共振成像上显示轻度或可疑的硬膜外强化,提示硬膜外炎症。所有这些磁共振成像异常均在复杂性区域疼痛综合征患者中检测到。2例硬膜外脓肿患者接受了硬膜外脓肿的手术探查和引流,不过所有患者均未观察到神经功能缺损。
神经性疼痛患者(尤其是复杂性区域疼痛综合征)中观察到的隧道式硬膜外导管感染风险较高,值得进一步研究。