Su Bo-An, Tang Hung-Jen, Wang Yin-Yi, Liu Yung-Ching, Ko Wen-Chien, Liu Cheng-Yi, Chuang Yin-Ching
Department of Medicine and Medical Research, Chi Mei Medical Center, Tainan, Taiwan.
J Microbiol Immunol Infect. 2005 Dec;38(6):425-9.
The most common clinical manifestation of Vibrio cholerae non-O1 non-O139 is gastroenteritis. This vibrion may also cause bacteremia, soft tissue infection, and other extraintestinal invasive disease, especially in immunocompromised patients. This study evaluated the current status of antimicrobial resistance in clinical isolates of V. cholerae non-O1 non-O139 in Taiwan as part of the SMART (Surveillance from Multicenter Antimicrobial Resistance in Taiwan) program. Minimal inhibitory concentrations (MICs) of 9 antimicrobial agents were determined by the agar dilution method. All of the isolates were susceptible to minocycline (MIC at which 90% of the isolates were inhibited [MIC(90)], 0.12 microg/mL), cefotaxime (MIC(90), 0.06 microg/mL), lomefloxacin (MIC(90), 0.12 microg/mL), levofloxacin (MIC(90), 0.03 microg/mL), ciprofloxacin (MIC(90), 0.03 microg/mL), moxifloxacin (MIC(90), 0.06 microg/mL), sparfloxacin (MIC(90), 0.06 microg/mL), gatifloxacin (MIC(90), 0.03 microg/mL), and cefazolin (MIC(90), 8 microg/mL). We conducted time-kill studies to evaluate the inhibitory activities of either cefazolin or minocycline alone or in combination against V. cholerae non-O1 non-O139 (Vc2). We also evaluated the inhibitory activity of cefazolin or cefotaxime combined with minocycline. The individual MICs of cefazolin, cefotaxime, and minocycline were 4 microg/mL, 0.0075 microg/mL, and 0.12 microg/mL, respectively, when approximately 5 x 105 colony-forming units/mL of V. cholerae non-O1 non-O139 was incubated. Bacterial growth was inhibited initially but resumed later when cefazolin, cefotaxime, or minocycline was used alone. When cefazoline or cefotaxime was combined with minocycline, V. cholerae non-O1 non-O139 was inhibited over 48 h and no regrowth was noted. We conclude that the combination of cefazolin or cefotaxime with minocycline has a synergistic inhibitory effect on V. cholerae non-O1 non-O139 in vitro.
非O1非O139群霍乱弧菌最常见的临床表现是肠胃炎。这种弧菌也可能引起菌血症、软组织感染及其他肠外侵袭性疾病,尤其是在免疫功能低下的患者中。本研究作为台湾地区SMART(台湾地区多中心抗菌药物耐药性监测)项目的一部分,评估了台湾地区非O1非O139群霍乱弧菌临床分离株的抗菌药物耐药现状。采用琼脂稀释法测定了9种抗菌药物的最低抑菌浓度(MIC)。所有分离株对米诺环素(90%分离株被抑制时的MIC[MIC(90)],0.12μg/mL)、头孢噻肟(MIC(90),0.06μg/mL)、洛美沙星(MIC(90),0.12μg/mL)、左氧氟沙星(MIC(90),0.03μg/mL)、环丙沙星(MIC(90),0.03μg/mL)、莫西沙星(MIC(90),0.06μg/mL)、司帕沙星(MIC(90),0.06μg/mL)、加替沙星(MIC(90),0.03μg/mL)和头孢唑林(MIC(90),8μg/mL)均敏感。我们进行了时间杀菌研究,以评估头孢唑林或米诺环素单独或联合使用对非O1非O139群霍乱弧菌(Vc2)的抑制活性。我们还评估了头孢唑林或头孢噻肟与米诺环素联合使用的抑制活性。当孵育约5×105CFU/mL的非O1非O139群霍乱弧菌时,头孢唑林、头孢噻肟和米诺环素的个体MIC分别为4μg/mL、0.0075μg/mL和0.12μg/mL。单独使用头孢唑林、头孢噻肟或米诺环素时,细菌生长最初受到抑制,但随后恢复。当头孢唑林或头孢噻肟与米诺环素联合使用时,非O1非O139群霍乱弧菌在48小时内受到抑制,未观察到再生长。我们得出结论,头孢唑林或头孢噻肟与米诺环素联合使用在体外对非O1非O139群霍乱弧菌具有协同抑制作用。