Mudgal K C, Gupta R, Singh S, Bhatia J S, Kalra M
Department of Orthopaedics, Paraplegia and Rehabilitation, Medical College and Hospital, Rohtak.
J Indian Med Assoc. 1992 Mar;90(3):52-4.
The relative efficacy of intermittent catheterisation, self or assisted, over indwelling catheterisation was studied on 44 patients of different extent of spinal cord lesions. All the surviving cases (9) of incomplete cord lesion became catheter free irrespective of the method of catheterisation. In these patients urine was also found to be infection free by the 5th week of admission. Twenty-seven cases of complete cord lesion (out of a total of 35) became catheter free, of whom 18 patients were on intermittent catheterisation (out of a total of 20) and 9 patients were on indwelling catheter (out of a total of 15 cases). In the later group incidence of urine infection was higher. Other complications like urethral trauma were comparable between patients with indwelling catheter and patients with intermittent, self or assisted, catheterisation.
对44例不同程度脊髓损伤患者研究了间歇性自行或辅助导尿与留置导尿相比的相对疗效。所有脊髓损伤不完全的存活病例(9例)无论采用何种导尿方法均不再需要导尿。在这些患者中,入院第5周时尿液也未发现感染。35例完全性脊髓损伤患者中有27例不再需要导尿,其中18例(共20例)采用间歇性导尿,9例(共15例)采用留置导尿。在后一组中,尿液感染发生率较高。留置导尿患者与间歇性自行或辅助导尿患者之间尿道创伤等其他并发症相当。