Hall H E, Hauser G H
Milk and Food Research Section, Public Health Service, Robert A. Taft Sanitary Engineering Center, Cincinnati, Ohio.
Appl Microbiol. 1966 Nov;14(6):928-33. doi: 10.1128/am.14.6.928-933.1966.
Duplicate fecal specimens from food handlers were collected in Louisiana. One set of specimens was examined immediately for salmonellae and shigellae by the Central Laboratory of the Louisiana State Board of Health in New Orleans; the other set was shipped to the Food Microbiology Unit at the Robert A. Taft Sanitary Engineering Center in Cincinnati, Ohio, where it was examined for enteropathogenic Escherichia coli (EEC) and Clostridium perfringens. A total of 219 specimens were examined by both laboratories. None yielded salmonellae or shigellae; 171 (78.1%) yielded C. perfringens; 175 (79.9%) yielded E. coli; and 14 (6.4%) yielded EEC. The 14 isolates of EEC were distributed among eight serotypes; one specimen yielded two serotypes. Multiple isolations of C. perfringens strains (two to four) were made from 64 (37.4%) of the specimens, and a total of 244 strains were isolated and studied for identifying characteristics. Of the total, only 87 (35.5%) could be identified serologically by a battery of 67 antisera; only 4 (1.6%) possessed the characteristics of the English "food-poisoning type." The hemolytic activity on agar containing horse, ox, or sheep blood showed that 140 (57.1%) were "hemolytic," 81 (33.1%) were "nonhemolytic," and 23 (9.8%) gave varied results. Only 12 (4.9%) of the strains produced spores that resisted boiling for 30 min or more.
在路易斯安那州采集了食品处理人员的粪便重复样本。一组样本立即由新奥尔良路易斯安那州卫生委员会中央实验室检测沙门氏菌和志贺氏菌;另一组样本被送往俄亥俄州辛辛那提市罗伯特·A·塔夫脱卫生工程中心的食品微生物学部门,检测其中的肠致病性大肠杆菌(EEC)和产气荚膜梭菌。两个实验室共检测了219份样本。未检出沙门氏菌或志贺氏菌;171份(78.1%)检出产气荚膜梭菌;175份(79.9%)检出大肠杆菌;14份(6.4%)检出EEC。14株EEC分离株分布在8个血清型中;1份样本检出两种血清型。64份(37.4%)样本中分离出多株(2至4株)产气荚膜梭菌菌株,共分离出244株菌株并研究其鉴定特征。其中,只有87株(35.5%)可通过一组67种抗血清进行血清学鉴定;只有4株(1.6%)具有英国“食物中毒型”的特征。在含有马、牛或羊血的琼脂上的溶血活性显示,140株(57.1%)为“溶血型”,81株(33.1%)为“非溶血型”,23株(9.8%)结果各异。只有12株(4.9%)菌株产生的芽孢能耐受30分钟或更长时间的煮沸。