Fleischman Debra A, Gabrieli John D E, Wilson Robert S, Moro Teresa T, Bennett David A
Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL 60612, USA.
Neuropsychology. 2005 Nov;19(6):750-9. doi: 10.1037/0894-4105.19.6.750.
The dissociation between intact priming and reduced explicit memory in aging has been called into question on the basis of limited information that suggests that priming measures are less reliable than explicit memory measures. No aging study to date, however, has offered a comprehensive examination of the reliability of these measures. Age-related performance and test-retest stability coefficients for multiple priming and explicit memory tasks were compared. Age effects were found on some tasks but not others, and stability was not related to task performance. Stability was similar for implicit versus explicit task instructions, younger versus older persons, and studied versus unstudied items. Results indicate that dissociations between priming and explicit memory performances cannot be accounted for by differential reliability of the measures.
基于有限信息,即启动效应测量不如外显记忆测量可靠,衰老过程中完整启动效应与外显记忆减退之间的分离受到了质疑。然而,迄今为止,尚无衰老研究对这些测量的可靠性进行全面考察。比较了多种启动效应和外显记忆任务的年龄相关表现及重测稳定性系数。在某些任务中发现了年龄效应,而在其他任务中未发现,并且稳定性与任务表现无关。对于内隐与外显任务指令、年轻人与年长者以及学习过与未学习过的项目,稳定性相似。结果表明,启动效应与外显记忆表现之间的分离不能用测量的差异可靠性来解释。