• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

诊断类别还是维度?关于《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第五版的一个问题。

Diagnostic categories or dimensions? A question for the Diagnostic And Statistical Manual Of Mental Disorders--fifth edition.

作者信息

Widiger Thomas A, Samuel Douglas B

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY 40506-0044, USA.

出版信息

J Abnorm Psychol. 2005 Nov;114(4):494-504. doi: 10.1037/0021-843X.114.4.494.

DOI:10.1037/0021-843X.114.4.494
PMID:16351373
Abstract

The question of whether mental disorders are discrete clinical conditions or arbitrary distinctions along dimensions of functioning is a long-standing issue, but its importance is escalating with the growing recognition of the frustrations and limitations engendered by the categorical model. The authors provide an overview of some of the dilemmas of the categorical model, followed by a discussion of research that addresses whether mental disorders are accurately or optimally classified categorically or dimensionally. The authors' intention is to document the importance of this issue and to suggest that future editions of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders give more recognition to dimensional models of classification. They conclude with a dimensional mental disorder classification that they suggest provides a useful model.

摘要

精神障碍是离散的临床病症还是沿着功能维度的任意区分,这一问题由来已久,但随着人们越来越认识到分类模型所带来的挫折和局限性,其重要性日益凸显。作者概述了分类模型的一些困境,随后讨论了关于精神障碍是按类别还是按维度进行准确或最优分类的研究。作者的目的是记录这一问题的重要性,并建议《精神障碍诊断与统计手册》未来版本更多地认可维度分类模型。他们最后给出了一个维度性精神障碍分类,认为这提供了一个有用的模型。

相似文献

1
Diagnostic categories or dimensions? A question for the Diagnostic And Statistical Manual Of Mental Disorders--fifth edition.诊断类别还是维度?关于《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第五版的一个问题。
J Abnorm Psychol. 2005 Nov;114(4):494-504. doi: 10.1037/0021-843X.114.4.494.
2
Dimensional versus categorical classification of mental disorders in the fifth edition of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders and beyond: comment on the special section.《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第五版及以后版本中精神障碍的维度分类与类别分类:对特别章节的评论
J Abnorm Psychol. 2005 Nov;114(4):551-6. doi: 10.1037/0021-843X.114.4.551.
3
A dimensional model of psychopathology.
Psychopathology. 2005 Jul-Aug;38(4):211-4. doi: 10.1159/000086094.
4
[Categorical versus dimensional classification of personality disorders: are dimensional models the future?].[人格障碍的分类与维度分类:维度模型是未来的方向吗?]
Fortschr Neurol Psychiatr. 2006 Dec;74(12):706-13. doi: 10.1055/s-2005-915593.
5
Annual research review: categories versus dimensions in the classification and conceptualisation of child and adolescent mental disorders--implications of recent empirical study.年度研究综述:儿童和青少年精神障碍分类和概念化中的类别与维度——近期实证研究的启示。
J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2012 May;53(5):469-89. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-7610.2011.02511.x. Epub 2012 Jan 31.
6
On categorical diagnoses in DSM-V: cutting dimensions at useful points?关于《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第五版中的分类诊断:在有用的节点划分维度?
Psychol Assess. 2009 Sep;21(3):294-301. doi: 10.1037/a0016697.
7
[The 5th revised edition of the DSM: a revolution half-accomplished].《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第五版修订版:已完成一半的革命
Recenti Prog Med. 2014 Apr;105(4):141-3. doi: 10.1701/1459.16119.
8
Deconstructing bipolar disorder: a critical review of its diagnostic validity and a proposal for DSM-V and ICD-11.剖析双相情感障碍:对其诊断效度的批判性综述以及对《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第五版和《国际疾病分类》第十一版的建议
Schizophr Bull. 2007 Jul;33(4):886-92. doi: 10.1093/schbul/sbm057. Epub 2007 Jun 11.
9
Clinical utility: a prerequisite for the adoption of a dimensional approach in DSM.临床效用:在《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》中采用维度方法的一个先决条件。
J Abnorm Psychol. 2005 Nov;114(4):560-4. doi: 10.1037/0021-843X.114.4.560.
10
Categories, dimensions and prototypes: critical issues for psychiatric classification.类别、维度与原型:精神疾病分类的关键问题
Psychopathology. 2005 Jul-Aug;38(4):201-5. doi: 10.1159/000086092.

引用本文的文献

1
Validating the Italian version of the Level of Personality Functioning Scale - Brief Form 2.0 (LPFS-BF 2.0): internal structure, temporal stability and construct validity.验证意大利语版人格功能水平量表简版2.0(LPFS-BF 2.0):内部结构、时间稳定性和结构效度。
Borderline Personal Disord Emot Dysregul. 2025 May 12;12(1):16. doi: 10.1186/s40479-025-00286-3.
2
Assessment of personality disorders in adolescents - a clinical validity and utility study of the structured interview of personality organization (STIPO).青少年人格障碍评估——人格组织结构化访谈(STIPO)的临床效度与实用性研究
Child Adolesc Psychiatry Ment Health. 2025 May 2;19(1):49. doi: 10.1186/s13034-025-00901-9.
3
On the structure of psychoeducational constructs: taxometric analysis and epistemological implications.
关于心理教育结构的结构:分类分析与认识论意义。
Front Psychol. 2025 Mar 17;16:1499960. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1499960. eCollection 2025.
4
Development of the psychopathological vulnerability index for screening at-risk youths: a Rasch model approach.用于筛查高危青少年的心理病理学易感性指数的开发:一种拉施模型方法。
Npj Ment Health Res. 2024 Dec 2;3(1):60. doi: 10.1038/s44184-024-00106-6.
5
Categorical and dimensional aspects of stimulant medication effects in adult patients with ADHD and healthy controls.多动症成年患者和健康对照中兴奋剂药物疗效的分类和维度方面。
Front Pharmacol. 2024 Jul 10;15:1412178. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2024.1412178. eCollection 2024.
6
Sleep profiles of different psychiatric traits.不同精神特质的睡眠模式。
Transl Psychiatry. 2024 Jul 12;14(1):284. doi: 10.1038/s41398-024-03009-4.
7
A new performance-based measure of personality functioning impairment: development and preliminary evaluation of reliability and validity.一种基于表现的人格功能损害新测量方法:信效度的开发与初步评估
Discov Ment Health. 2024 Feb 22;4(1):6. doi: 10.1007/s44192-024-00059-4.
8
The dimensional structure of internalizing psychopathology: Relation to diagnostic categories.内化性精神病理学的维度结构:与诊断类别的关系。
Clin Psychol Sci. 2023 Nov;11(6):1044-1063. doi: 10.1177/21677026221119483. Epub 2022 Dec 8.
9
Latent profile analysis of gambling.赌博的潜在类别分析
Front Psychol. 2023 Oct 26;14:1293933. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1293933. eCollection 2023.
10
Measuring Integrated Novel Dimensions in Neurodevelopmental and Stress-Related Mental Disorders (MIND-SET): Protocol for a Cross-sectional Comorbidity Study From a Research Domain Criteria Perspective.测量神经发育和应激相关精神障碍中的综合新维度(MIND-SET):基于研究领域标准视角的横断面共病研究方案
JMIRx Med. 2022 Mar 29;3(1):e31269. doi: 10.2196/31269.