Snyder Hannah R, Silton Rebecca L, Hankin Benjamin L, Smolker Harry R, Kaiser Roselinde H, Banich Marie T, Miller Gregory A, Heller Wendy
Department of Psychology, Brandeis University.
Department of Psychology, Loyola University Chicago.
Clin Psychol Sci. 2023 Nov;11(6):1044-1063. doi: 10.1177/21677026221119483. Epub 2022 Dec 8.
Recent approaches aim to represent the dimensional structure of psychopathology, but relatively little research has rigorously tested sub-dimensions within internalizing psychopathology. This study tests pre-registered models of the dimensional structure of internalizing psychopathology, and their relations with current and lifetime depressive and anxiety disorders diagnostic data, in adult samples harmonized across three sites (=427). Across S-1 bifactor and hierarchical models, we found converging evidence for both general and specific internalizing dimensions. Depression, generalized anxiety disorder (GAD), social anxiety disorder (SAD), and panic attacks were all associated with a general internalizing factor that we posit primarily represents motivational anhedonia. GAD was also associated with a specific anxious apprehension factor, and SAD with specific anxious apprehension and low positive affect factors. We suggest that dimensional approaches capturing shared and specific internalizing symptom facets more accurately describe the structure of internalizing psychopathology and provide useful alternatives to categorical diagnoses to advance clinical science.
近期的研究方法旨在呈现精神病理学的维度结构,但相对较少的研究对内化性精神病理学中的子维度进行过严格测试。本研究在三个地点协调的成年样本(=427)中,测试了内化性精神病理学维度结构的预注册模型,以及它们与当前和终生抑郁及焦虑症诊断数据的关系。在S-1双因素模型和层次模型中,我们发现了支持一般和特定内化维度的趋同证据。抑郁症、广泛性焦虑症(GAD)、社交焦虑症(SAD)和惊恐发作均与一个一般内化因子相关,我们认为该因子主要代表动机性快感缺乏。GAD还与一个特定的焦虑担忧因子相关,SAD与特定的焦虑担忧和低积极情感因子相关。我们建议,捕捉共享和特定内化症状方面的维度方法能更准确地描述内化性精神病理学的结构,并为类别诊断提供有用的替代方案,以推动临床科学发展。