Suppr超能文献

一种基于表现的人格功能损害新测量方法:信效度的开发与初步评估

A new performance-based measure of personality functioning impairment: development and preliminary evaluation of reliability and validity.

作者信息

Natoli Adam P, Rodriguez Chloe M

机构信息

Department of Psychology and Philosophy, Sam Houston State University, Huntsville, TX, USA.

出版信息

Discov Ment Health. 2024 Feb 22;4(1):6. doi: 10.1007/s44192-024-00059-4.

Abstract

Personality functioning impairment is at the center of many dimensional models of personality. Available measures of personality functioning impairment are limited to self-report, clinician-/informant-rated, and interview methods. Although researchers have begun investigating established performance-based instruments' potential for assessing personality functioning impairment, administration and scoring of these instruments is complex and the latent variables they measure diverge from personality functioning impairment as described in the ICD-11 and the Alternative Model for Personality Disorders (AMPD) of the DSM. We address this absence by developing and psychometrically evaluating the Level of Personality Functioning Scale-Questionnaire-based Implicit Association Test (LPFS-qIAT). The LPFS-qIAT's psychometric properties were evaluated across four studies, producing initial evidence supporting the new instrument's reliability as well as its convergent, discriminant, and criterion-related validity. As the first performance-based measure of personality functioning impairment that aligns with the AMPD and, to a degree the ICD-11, that is easily administered, scored, and interpreted, the LPFS-qIAT shows potential to become a valuable tool in both research and clinical practice.

摘要

人格功能损害处于许多人格维度模型的核心位置。现有的评估人格功能损害的方法仅限于自我报告、临床医生/知情者评定以及访谈法。尽管研究人员已开始探究既定的基于表现的工具在评估人格功能损害方面的潜力,但这些工具的施测和计分很复杂,而且它们所测量的潜在变量与《国际疾病分类第11版》(ICD - 11)和《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》(DSM)的人格障碍替代模型(AMPD)中所描述的人格功能损害有所不同。我们通过开发并对基于问卷的人格功能水平量表内隐联想测验(LPFS - qIAT)进行心理测量学评估来解决这一空白。我们在四项研究中对LPFS - qIAT的心理测量特性进行了评估,得出了初步证据,支持这一新工具的信度以及其聚合效度、区分效度和与标准相关的效度。作为首个与AMPD以及在一定程度上与ICD - 11相一致的、易于施测、计分和解释的基于表现的人格功能损害测量工具,LPFS - qIAT在研究和临床实践中都显示出成为一种有价值工具的潜力。

相似文献

4
Level of personality functioning as a predictor of psychosocial functioning-Concurrent validity of criterion A.
Personal Disord. 2020 Mar;11(2):79-90. doi: 10.1037/per0000352. Epub 2019 Oct 3.
6
Evaluation of Diagnostic Thresholds for Criterion A in the Alternative Model for Personality Disorders.
J Pers Disord. 2020 Dec;34(Supplement C):40-61. doi: 10.1521/pedi_2019_33_455. Epub 2019 Nov 4.
7
Expanding the Scope of Implicit Personality Assessment: An Examination of the Questionnaire-Based Implicit Association Test (qIAT).
J Pers Assess. 2021 May-Jun;103(3):380-391. doi: 10.1080/00223891.2020.1754230. Epub 2020 Apr 20.
10
[The alternative model of personality disorders among the French population: Assessment with brief tools].
Encephale. 2023 Oct;49(5):496-503. doi: 10.1016/j.encep.2022.03.012. Epub 2022 Aug 13.

本文引用的文献

1
Development and psychometric evaluation of the Personality Disorder Severity ICD-11 (PDS-ICD-11) Clinician-Rating Form.
Personal Ment Health. 2024 Feb;18(1):60-68. doi: 10.1002/pmh.1596. Epub 2023 Nov 9.
2
Comparing Measures of Criterion A to Better Understand Incremental Validity in the Alternative Model of Personality Disorders.
Assessment. 2023 Apr;30(3):689-705. doi: 10.1177/10731911211059763. Epub 2021 Dec 17.
3
Exploring the Alternative Model for Personality Disorders Using SCORS-G Ratings on Thematic Apperception Test Narratives.
J Pers Disord. 2022 Apr;36(2):201-216. doi: 10.1521/pedi_2021_35_535. Epub 2021 Aug 24.
4
Professional Practice Guidelines for Personality Assessment.
J Pers Assess. 2022 Jan-Feb;104(1):1-16. doi: 10.1080/00223891.2021.1942020. Epub 2021 Jul 20.
5
Development and initial evaluation of the ICD-11 personality disorder severity scale: PDS-ICD-11.
Personal Ment Health. 2021 Aug;15(3):223-236. doi: 10.1002/pmh.1510. Epub 2021 May 17.
6
Costs of schizotypal disorder: A matched-controlled nationwide register-based study of patients and spouses.
Acta Psychiatr Scand. 2021 Jul;144(1):60-71. doi: 10.1111/acps.13292. Epub 2021 Mar 17.
8
Welfare consequences of early-onset Borderline Personality Disorder: a nationwide register-based case-control study.
Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2022 Feb;31(2):253-260. doi: 10.1007/s00787-020-01683-5. Epub 2020 Nov 24.
9
Assessment of Criterion A.
Curr Opin Psychol. 2021 Feb;37:98-103. doi: 10.1016/j.copsyc.2020.09.009. Epub 2020 Sep 22.
10
International Assessment of DSM-5 and ICD-11 Personality Disorder Traits: Toward a Common Nosology in DSM-5.1.
Psychopathology. 2020;53(3-4):179-188. doi: 10.1159/000507589. Epub 2020 May 5.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验