Natoli Adam P, Rodriguez Chloe M
Department of Psychology and Philosophy, Sam Houston State University, Huntsville, TX, USA.
Discov Ment Health. 2024 Feb 22;4(1):6. doi: 10.1007/s44192-024-00059-4.
Personality functioning impairment is at the center of many dimensional models of personality. Available measures of personality functioning impairment are limited to self-report, clinician-/informant-rated, and interview methods. Although researchers have begun investigating established performance-based instruments' potential for assessing personality functioning impairment, administration and scoring of these instruments is complex and the latent variables they measure diverge from personality functioning impairment as described in the ICD-11 and the Alternative Model for Personality Disorders (AMPD) of the DSM. We address this absence by developing and psychometrically evaluating the Level of Personality Functioning Scale-Questionnaire-based Implicit Association Test (LPFS-qIAT). The LPFS-qIAT's psychometric properties were evaluated across four studies, producing initial evidence supporting the new instrument's reliability as well as its convergent, discriminant, and criterion-related validity. As the first performance-based measure of personality functioning impairment that aligns with the AMPD and, to a degree the ICD-11, that is easily administered, scored, and interpreted, the LPFS-qIAT shows potential to become a valuable tool in both research and clinical practice.
人格功能损害处于许多人格维度模型的核心位置。现有的评估人格功能损害的方法仅限于自我报告、临床医生/知情者评定以及访谈法。尽管研究人员已开始探究既定的基于表现的工具在评估人格功能损害方面的潜力,但这些工具的施测和计分很复杂,而且它们所测量的潜在变量与《国际疾病分类第11版》(ICD - 11)和《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》(DSM)的人格障碍替代模型(AMPD)中所描述的人格功能损害有所不同。我们通过开发并对基于问卷的人格功能水平量表内隐联想测验(LPFS - qIAT)进行心理测量学评估来解决这一空白。我们在四项研究中对LPFS - qIAT的心理测量特性进行了评估,得出了初步证据,支持这一新工具的信度以及其聚合效度、区分效度和与标准相关的效度。作为首个与AMPD以及在一定程度上与ICD - 11相一致的、易于施测、计分和解释的基于表现的人格功能损害测量工具,LPFS - qIAT在研究和临床实践中都显示出成为一种有价值工具的潜力。