Suppr超能文献

静脉注射伊布利特与普罗帕酮用于快速终止近期发作房颤的比较。

Comparison of intravenous ibutilide vs. propafenone for rapid termination of recent onset atrial fibrillation.

作者信息

Zhang N, Guo J H, Zhang H Ch, Li X B, Zhang P, Xn Y

机构信息

Department of Clinical Cardiac Electrophysiology, People's Hospital, Peking University, Beijing, China.

出版信息

Int J Clin Pract. 2005 Dec;59(12):1395-400. doi: 10.1111/j.1368-5031.2005.00705.x.

Abstract

This study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of ibutilide and propafenone given intravenously in converting recent onset atrial fibrillation (AF). Eighty-two consecutive patients with AF (onset in 2 h to 90 days) were randomly assigned to receive two 10-min infusions, 10 min apart, of either ibutilide (1 mg) or propafenone (70 mg). The treatment was considered successful if sinus rhythm occurred within 90 min after the beginning of infusion. Ibutilide had a significantly higher rate of cardioversion than propafenone (70.73 vs. 48.78%, p = 0.043). The patients with shorter AF duration or smaller left atrium diameter had a higher success rate. Nonsustained monomorphic ventricular tachycardia was the most serious adverse effect of ibutilide in 9.76% of patients, and hypotension and heart pause were the major serious adverse events in 17.07% of patients treated with propafenone. Ibutilide is more effective than intravenous propafenone for the cardioversion of recent onset AF, and the adverse effects are rare and transient.

摘要

本研究旨在评估静脉注射伊布利特和普罗帕酮转复近期发作房颤(AF)的疗效和安全性。82例连续的房颤患者(发作时间在2小时至90天之间)被随机分配接受两次10分钟的静脉输注,两次输注间隔10分钟,分别给予伊布利特(1毫克)或普罗帕酮(70毫克)。如果在输注开始后90分钟内出现窦性心律,则认为治疗成功。伊布利特的转复率显著高于普罗帕酮(70.73%对48.78%,p = 0.043)。房颤持续时间较短或左心房直径较小的患者成功率较高。非持续性单形性室性心动过速是伊布利特在9.76%患者中最严重的不良反应,低血压和心脏停搏是普罗帕酮治疗患者中17.07%的主要严重不良事件。对于近期发作房颤的转复,伊布利特比静脉注射普罗帕酮更有效,且不良反应罕见且短暂。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验