Cunningham Connell, Glish Gary L, Burinsky David J
Department of Chemistry, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27599, USA.
J Am Soc Mass Spectrom. 2006 Jan;17(1):81-4. doi: 10.1016/j.jasms.2005.09.007. Epub 2005 Dec 15.
Collision induced dissociation (CID) in a quadrupole ion trap mass spectrometer using the conventional 30 ms activation time is compared with high amplitude short time excitation (HASTE) CID using 2 ms and 1 ms activation times. As a result of the shorter activation times, dissociation of the parent ions using the HASTE CID technique requires resonance excitation voltages greater than conventional CID. After activation, the rf trapping voltage is lowered to allow product ions below the low mass cut-off to be trapped. The HASTE CID spectra are notably different from those obtained using conventional CID and can include product ions below the low mass cut-off for the parent ions of interest. The MS/MS efficiencies of HASTE CID are not significantly different when compared with the conventional 30 ms CID. Similar results were obtained with a two-dimensional (linear) ion trap and a three-dimensional ion trap.
在四极杆离子阱质谱仪中,将使用传统30毫秒激活时间的碰撞诱导解离(CID)与使用2毫秒和1毫秒激活时间的高振幅短时间激发(HASTE)CID进行了比较。由于激活时间较短,使用HASTE CID技术使母离子解离需要比传统CID更高的共振激发电压。激活后,降低射频捕获电压,以捕获低于低质量截止值的产物离子。HASTE CID光谱与使用传统CID获得的光谱明显不同,并且可能包括低于感兴趣母离子低质量截止值的产物离子。与传统的30毫秒CID相比,HASTE CID的串联质谱效率没有显著差异。在二维(线性)离子阱和三维离子阱中也获得了类似的结果。