• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[工业有害物质职业暴露评估。五、一种使用单日测量评估员工暴露平均值(8小时时间加权平均浓度)的建议方法]

[Assessment of occupational exposures to industrial hazardous substances. V. A proposed method for evaluating employee's exposure averages (8-h TWAs) using a single day measurement].

作者信息

Kumagai S, Matsunaga I, Kusaka Y

机构信息

Department of Occupational Health, Osaka Prefectural Institute of Public Health.

出版信息

Sangyo Igaku. 1992 Jan;34(1):30-8. doi: 10.1539/joh1959.34.30.

DOI:10.1539/joh1959.34.30
PMID:1635273
Abstract

Daily exposure averages (8-h TWAs) to hazardous substances may vary considerably day to day, even though a worker is engaged in the same job. Previously we proposed a method to evaluate a long-term exposure condition with interday fluctuation using some exposure measurements. As it is assumed that 8-h TWAs are log-normally distributed, geometric standard deviation (sigma g) representing true interday fluctuation of 8-h TWAs should be estimated. If a single day's 8-h TWA of a worker is measured, sigma g of his own distribution of 8-h TWAs cannot be estimated. Therefore, to evaluate a long-term condition using a single day's 8-h TWA, representative sigma g in all industrial workplaces must be determined beforehand. To investigate sigma g observed in many industrial workplaces, two days' 8-h TWAs of each worker were measured in a week on 260 workers exposed to 19 hazardous substances. Sg2 (geometric standard deviation estimated by two samples) ranged from 1.00 to 8.22 with a median of 1.47 and a 90% upper limit of 2.47. Transforming Sg2 into sigma g, median and 90% upper limit of sigma g were 1.75 and 2.47, respectively. According to a classification scheme in the proposed method, exposure levels (I to III) were calculated using sigma g of 1.75 and 2.47. A long-term exposure condition to hazardous substances can be evaluated by comparing a single day's 8-h TWA with the exposure levels.

摘要

即使工人从事相同工作,有害物质的每日暴露平均值(8小时时间加权平均值)也可能每天有很大差异。此前我们提出了一种方法,通过一些暴露测量来评估存在日间波动的长期暴露状况。由于假定8小时时间加权平均值呈对数正态分布,所以应估计代表8小时时间加权平均值真实日间波动的几何标准差(σg)。如果只测量一名工人某一天的8小时时间加权平均值,就无法估计其自身8小时时间加权平均值分布的σg。因此,为了使用某一天的8小时时间加权平均值来评估长期状况,必须事先确定所有工业工作场所的代表性σg。为了调查许多工业工作场所观察到的σg,对260名接触19种有害物质的工人,在一周内测量了他们每人两天的8小时时间加权平均值。Sg2(由两个样本估计的几何标准差)范围为1.00至8.22,中位数为1.47,90%上限为2.47。将Sg2转换为σg后,σg的中位数和90%上限分别为1.75和2.47。根据所提方法中的分类方案,使用1.75和2.47的σg计算暴露水平(I至III)。通过将某一天的8小时时间加权平均值与暴露水平进行比较,可以评估对有害物质的长期暴露状况。

相似文献

1
[Assessment of occupational exposures to industrial hazardous substances. V. A proposed method for evaluating employee's exposure averages (8-h TWAs) using a single day measurement].[工业有害物质职业暴露评估。五、一种使用单日测量评估员工暴露平均值(8小时时间加权平均浓度)的建议方法]
Sangyo Igaku. 1992 Jan;34(1):30-8. doi: 10.1539/joh1959.34.30.
2
[Assessment of occupational exposures to industrial hazardous substances. III. On the frequency distribution of daily exposure averages (8-h TWA)].[工业有害物质职业暴露评估。III. 日平均暴露量(8小时时间加权平均浓度)的频率分布]
Sangyo Igaku. 1989 Jul;31(4):216-26. doi: 10.1539/joh1959.31.216.
3
[Assessment of occupational exposures to industrial hazardous substances. II. Interday fluctuations of the daily exposure averages among workers exposed to lead].[工业有害物质职业暴露评估。II. 铅暴露工人每日平均暴露量的日间波动情况]
Sangyo Igaku. 1988 May;30(3):186-95. doi: 10.1539/joh1959.30.186.
4
[Assessment of occupational exposures to industrial hazardous substances. I. A proposed method based on interday fluctuation of contaminant concentrations for evaluating employee's exposure averages (TWAs)].职业性接触工业有害物质的评估。I. 一种基于污染物浓度日间波动评估员工接触平均值(时间加权平均值)的提议方法。
Sangyo Igaku. 1988 May;30(3):179-85. doi: 10.1539/joh1959.30.179.
5
[Assessment of occupational exposures to industrial hazardous substances. IV. A proposed method based on one-sided tolerance limits].[工业有害物质职业暴露评估。IV. 基于单侧公差极限的一种建议方法]
Sangyo Igaku. 1989 Jul;31(4):227-34. doi: 10.1539/joh1959.31.227.
6
Environmental versus analytical variability in exposure measurements.暴露测量中的环境变异性与分析变异性
Am Ind Hyg Assoc J. 1991 Dec;52(12):553-7. doi: 10.1080/15298669191365199.
7
Occupational Noise Exposure of Employees at Locally-Owned Restaurants in a College Town.大学城本地餐馆员工的职业噪声暴露情况
J Occup Environ Hyg. 2015;12(7):489-99. doi: 10.1080/15459624.2015.1018517.
8
Changes in the distribution of short-term exposure concentration with different averaging times.
Am Ind Hyg Assoc J. 1995 Jan;56(1):24-31. doi: 10.1080/15428119591017277.
9
Evaluation of recommended REACH exposure modeling tools and near-field, far-field model in assessing occupational exposure to toluene from spray paint.评估推荐的化学品注册、评估、授权和限制(REACH)暴露建模工具以及近场、远场模型在评估喷漆作业中职业接触甲苯的情况。
Ann Occup Hyg. 2013 Mar;57(2):210-20. doi: 10.1093/annhyg/mes062. Epub 2012 Sep 20.
10
Autocorrelation of short-term and daily average exposure levels in workplaces.工作场所短期和每日平均暴露水平的自相关。
Am Ind Hyg Assoc J. 1993 Jul;54(7):341-50. doi: 10.1080/15298669391354793.