Suppr超能文献

暴露测量中的环境变异性与分析变异性

Environmental versus analytical variability in exposure measurements.

作者信息

Nicas M, Simmons B P, Spear R C

机构信息

Center for Occupational and Environmental Health, School of Public Health, University of California, Berkeley 94720.

出版信息

Am Ind Hyg Assoc J. 1991 Dec;52(12):553-7. doi: 10.1080/15298669191365199.

Abstract

Measurements of 8-hr time-weighted average (TWA) exposures are subject to environmental variability and collection and analytical error. Environmental variability can be represented by the geometric standard deviation (GSD) of the lognormally distributed 8-hr TWAs; analytical variability can be represented by the coefficient of variation (CV) of the normally distributed collection and analytical errors. A mathematical expression is derived for the variance of the measured 8-hr TWAs as a function of the GSD of the true daily average exposures and the total CV of the industrial hygiene method used in monitoring. For typical values of the GSD and CV, environmental variability is far more important than analytical variability in determining the variance of the measured 8-hr TWAs. A resulting policy implication is that the Occupational Safety and Health Administration inappropriately focuses on analytical variability when determining compliance with its permissible exposure limits.

摘要

8小时时间加权平均(TWA)暴露量的测量会受到环境变异性以及采集和分析误差的影响。环境变异性可以用对数正态分布的8小时TWA的几何标准差(GSD)来表示;分析变异性可以用正态分布的采集和分析误差的变异系数(CV)来表示。本文推导了一个数学表达式,用于表示测量得到的8小时TWA的方差,该方差是真实日平均暴露量的GSD和监测中使用的工业卫生方法的总CV的函数。对于GSD和CV的典型值,在确定测量得到的8小时TWA的方差时,环境变异性比分析变异性重要得多。由此产生的一个政策影响是,职业安全与健康管理局在确定是否符合其允许暴露限值时,不恰当地将重点放在了分析变异性上。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验