Muheim Rachel, Moore Frank R, Phillips John B
Department of Animal Ecology, Lund University, SE-223 62 Lund, Sweden.
J Exp Biol. 2006 Jan;209(Pt 1):2-17. doi: 10.1242/jeb.01960.
Migratory birds use multiple sources of compass information for orientation, including the geomagnetic field, the sun, skylight polarization patterns and star patterns. In this paper we review the results of cue-conflict experiments designed to determine the relative importance of the different compass mechanisms, and how directional information from these compass mechanisms is integrated. We focus on cue-conflict experiments in which the magnetic field was shifted in alignment relative to natural celestial cues. Consistent with the conclusions of earlier authors, our analyses suggest that during the premigratory season, celestial information is given the greatest salience and used to recalibrate the magnetic compass by both juvenile and adult birds. Sunset polarized light patterns from the region of the sky near the horizon appear to provide the calibration reference for the magnetic compass. In contrast, during migration, a majority of experiments suggest that birds rely on the magnetic field as the primary source of compass information and use it to calibrate celestial compass cues, i.e. the relative saliency of magnetic and celestial cues is reversed. An alternative possibility, however, is suggested by several experiments in which birds exposed to a cue conflict during migration appear to have recalibrated the magnetic compass, i.e. their response is similar to that of birds exposed to cue conflicts during the premigratory season. The general pattern to emerge from these analyses is that birds exposed to the cue conflict with a view of the entire sunset sky tended to recalibrate the magnetic compass, regardless of whether the cue conflict occurred during the premigratory or migratory period. In contrast, birds exposed to the cue conflict in orientation funnels and registration cages that restricted their view of the region of sky near the horizon (as was generally the case in experiments carried out during the migratory season) did not recalibrate the magnetic compass but, instead, used the magnetic compass to calibrate the other celestial compass systems. If access to critical celestial cues, rather than the timing of exposure to the cue conflict (i.e. premigratory vs migratory), determines whether recalibration of the magnetic compass occurs, this suggests that under natural conditions there may be a single calibration reference for all of the compass systems of migratory birds that is derived from sunset (and possibly also sunrise) polarized light cues from the region of sky near the horizon. In cue-conflict experiments carried out during the migratory season, there was also an interesting asymmetry in the birds' response to magnetic fields shifted clockwise and counterclockwise relative to celestial cues. We discuss two possible explanations for these differences: (1) lateral asymmetry in the role of the right and left eye in mediating light-dependent magnetic compass orientation and (2) interference from the spectral and intensity distribution of skylight at sunset with the response of the light-dependent magnetic compass.
候鸟利用多种罗盘信息源进行定向,包括地磁场、太阳、天空光偏振模式和星象模式。在本文中,我们回顾了旨在确定不同罗盘机制相对重要性的线索冲突实验结果,以及这些罗盘机制的方向信息是如何整合的。我们重点关注磁场相对于自然天体线索在方向上发生偏移的线索冲突实验。与早期作者的结论一致,我们的分析表明,在迁徙前季节,天体信息最为显著,幼鸟和成鸟都会用它来重新校准磁罗盘。来自地平线附近天空区域的日落偏振光模式似乎为磁罗盘提供了校准参考。相比之下,在迁徙期间,大多数实验表明鸟类依赖磁场作为罗盘信息的主要来源,并用它来校准天体罗盘线索,即磁线索和天体线索的相对显著性发生了逆转。然而,有几个实验提出了另一种可能性,在这些实验中,在迁徙期间暴露于线索冲突的鸟类似乎重新校准了磁罗盘,即它们的反应与在迁徙前季节暴露于线索冲突的鸟类相似。这些分析得出的总体模式是,无论线索冲突发生在迁徙前还是迁徙期间,暴露于整个日落天空视野中的线索冲突的鸟类往往会重新校准磁罗盘。相比之下,在定向漏斗和记录笼中暴露于线索冲突的鸟类,由于这些地方限制了它们对地平线附近天空区域的视野(在迁徙季节进行的实验通常如此),它们没有重新校准磁罗盘,而是用磁罗盘来校准其他天体罗盘系统。如果获取关键天体线索而非暴露于线索冲突的时间(即迁徙前与迁徙期间)决定了磁罗盘是否会重新校准,这表明在自然条件下,候鸟所有罗盘系统可能存在一个单一的校准参考,它来自地平线附近天空区域的日落(可能还有日出)偏振光线索。在迁徙季节进行的线索冲突实验中,鸟类对相对于天体线索顺时针和逆时针偏移的磁场的反应也存在有趣的不对称性。我们讨论了这些差异的两种可能解释:(1)右眼和左眼在介导依赖光的磁罗盘定向中的作用存在横向不对称;(2)日落时天空光的光谱和强度分布对依赖光的磁罗盘反应的干扰。