Suppr超能文献

对于降低潜在严重冠状动脉疾病的可能性而言,颈动脉斑块面积检测呈阴性优于其他非侵入性动脉粥样硬化研究。

A negative carotid plaque area test is superior to other noninvasive atherosclerosis studies for reducing the likelihood of having underlying significant coronary artery disease.

作者信息

Brook Robert D, Bard Robert L, Patel Smita, Rubenfire Melvyn, Clarke Nicholas S, Kazerooni Ella A, Wakefield Thomas W, Henke Peter K, Eagle Kim A

机构信息

Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.

出版信息

Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2006 Mar;26(3):656-62. doi: 10.1161/01.ATV.0000200079.18690.60. Epub 2005 Dec 15.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Coronary calcium score (CCS), carotid plaque area (CPA), intima-media thickness (IMT), and C-reactive protein (CRP) are independent predictors of cardiovascular prognosis. Although each test may enhance risk stratification, their comparative abilities to screen for underlying coronary stenoses in individual patients is less established.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Forty-two patients who had a 16-slice coronary computed tomography angiogram (CTA) performed were invited to have CPA, IMT, and CRP measured. CPA was defined as the sum of all the cross-sectional areas of each plaque >1 mm in diameter found in all carotid vessels bilaterally. CCS and the number plus degree of stenotic coronary arteries were determined by CTA. The presence of clinically significant coronary artery disease (CAD) was defined as the existence of any stenosis > or =50%. CTA identified clinically significant CAD in 43% of the patients. CPA >0 was more sensitive (72%) and specific (58%) than a CCS >0 (58% and 55%) for identifying CAD. A "clean" carotid artery (CPA=0) provides a superior negative predictive value (74%) and likelihood ratio of a negative test (0.48) than all other studies, in particular versus a CCS=0 (65% and 0.72). The areas under the receiver-operator curves for CPA and CCS in relation to any CAD were similar (0.640 versus 0.675). Carotid IMT and CRP performed poorly compared with CPA and CCS. For detecting CAD in only the left main or left anterior descending artery, the negative predictive value and likelihood ratio of a negative test remained superior for CPA (87% and 0.33) compared with CCS (80% and 0.56). In our population with a prevalence of these coronary lesions of 30%, the post-test probability in any patient with a negative CPA result is reduced to 10%.

CONCLUSIONS

CPA determination is superior to CCS, IMT, and CRP in its ability to reduce the likelihood of clinically significant underlying CAD in patients of varying cardiac risk.

摘要

目的

冠状动脉钙化积分(CCS)、颈动脉斑块面积(CPA)、内膜中层厚度(IMT)及C反应蛋白(CRP)是心血管预后的独立预测指标。尽管每项检查都可能改善风险分层,但它们在个体患者中筛查潜在冠状动脉狭窄的比较能力尚不太明确。

方法与结果

邀请42例行16层冠状动脉计算机断层扫描血管造影(CTA)的患者进行CPA、IMT及CRP检测。CPA定义为双侧所有颈动脉中直径>1 mm的每个斑块的所有横截面积之和。通过CTA确定CCS以及狭窄冠状动脉的数量和程度。临床显著冠状动脉疾病(CAD)的存在定义为存在任何≥50%的狭窄。CTA在43%的患者中发现了临床显著CAD。对于识别CAD,CPA>0比CCS>0更敏感(72%)和特异(58%)(分别为58%和55%)。“干净”的颈动脉(CPA = 0)提供了比所有其他检查更高的阴性预测值(74%)和阴性试验似然比(0.48),特别是与CCS = 0(65%和0.72)相比。CPA和CCS相对于任何CAD的受试者操作曲线下面积相似(分别为0.640和0.675)。与CPA和CCS相比,颈动脉IMT和CRP表现不佳。对于仅检测左主干或左前降支中的CAD,CPA的阴性预测值和阴性试验似然比(分别为87%和0.33)仍然优于CCS(分别为80%和0.56)。在我们这个冠状动脉病变患病率为30%的人群中,任何CPA结果为阴性的患者的验后概率降至10%。

结论

在降低不同心脏风险患者中临床显著潜在CAD可能性的能力方面,CPA测定优于CCS、IMT和CRP。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验