• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Data quality in the outpatient setting: impact on clinical decision support systems.门诊环境中的数据质量:对临床决策支持系统的影响。
AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2005;2005:41-5.
2
Improving ambulatory prescribing safety with a handheld decision support system: a randomized controlled trial.使用手持决策支持系统提高门诊处方安全性:一项随机对照试验。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2006 Mar-Apr;13(2):171-9. doi: 10.1197/jamia.M1961. Epub 2005 Dec 15.
3
CDSS-RM: a clinical decision support system reference model.CDSS-RM:临床决策支持系统参考模型。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2018 Nov 16;18(1):137. doi: 10.1186/s12874-018-0587-6.
4
The prompt, the alert, and the legal record: documenting clinical decision support systems.
J AHIMA. 2005 Feb;76(2):24-8; quiz 31-2.
5
Cost-effectiveness of an electronic medication ordering system (CPOE/CDSS) in hospitalized patients.电子医嘱录入系统(CPOE/CDSS)在住院患者中的成本效益分析。
Int J Med Inform. 2014 Aug;83(8):572-80. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2014.05.003. Epub 2014 May 23.
6
Computerized physician order entry of medications and clinical decision support can improve problem list documentation compliance.计算机化医嘱录入和临床决策支持可以提高问题列表文档记录的合规性。
Int J Med Inform. 2010 May;79(5):332-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2008.05.005. Epub 2008 Jul 2.
7
Are we setting about improving the safety of computerised prescribing in the right way? A workshop report.我们采取的改善计算机化处方安全性的方式正确吗?一份研讨会报告。
Inform Prim Care. 2009;17(3):175-82. doi: 10.14236/jhi.v17i3.732.
8
Paving the Way for the Implementation of a Decision Support System for Antibiotic Prescribing in Primary Care in West Africa: Preimplementation and Co-Design Workshop With Physicians.为西非初级保健中抗生素处方决策支持系统的实施铺平道路:与医生的实施前和协同设计研讨会
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Jul 20;22(7):e17940. doi: 10.2196/17940.
9
Decision support systems in clinical practice: The case of venous thromboembolism prevention.临床实践中的决策支持系统:以静脉血栓栓塞预防为例。
Int J Risk Saf Med. 2015;27 Suppl 1:S104-5. doi: 10.3233/JRS-150709.
10
Documentation and coding of ED patient encounters: an evaluation of the accuracy of an electronic medical record.急诊患者诊疗记录与编码:电子病历准确性评估
Am J Emerg Med. 2006 Oct;24(6):664-78. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2006.02.005.

引用本文的文献

1
Appropriate semantic qualifiers increase diagnostic accuracy when using a clinical decision support system: a randomized controlled trial.使用临床决策支持系统时,恰当的语义限定词可提高诊断准确性:一项随机对照试验。
BMC Med Educ. 2025 May 15;25(1):711. doi: 10.1186/s12909-025-07294-5.
2
Quality of registration and adherence to guidelines for blood management in CABG surgeries: a case study.冠状动脉旁路移植术(CABG)手术中血液管理的登记质量及对指南的遵循情况:一项案例研究
J Cardiothorac Surg. 2025 Jan 20;20(1):78. doi: 10.1186/s13019-024-03331-4.
3
Unified Clinical Vocabulary Embeddings for Advancing Precision Medicine.用于推进精准医学的统一临床词汇嵌入
medRxiv. 2024 Dec 10:2024.12.03.24318322. doi: 10.1101/2024.12.03.24318322.
4
Differences in changes of data completeness after the implementation of an electronic medical record in three surgical departments of a German hospital-a longitudinal comparative document analysis.德国某医院三个外科部门实施电子病历后数据完整性变化的差异——一项纵向比较文献分析。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2024 Sep 16;24(1):258. doi: 10.1186/s12911-024-02667-0.
5
Expectation of clinical decision support systems: a survey study among nephrologist end-users.临床决策支持系统的期望:肾病专家终端用户的调查研究。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2023 Oct 26;23(1):239. doi: 10.1186/s12911-023-02317-x.
6
"What brought you in today?": Modeling patient-provider clinic visits to characterize rural providers' antibiotic treatment decisions.“你今天为什么来?”:建立患者-提供者就诊模型,以描述农村提供者的抗生素治疗决策。
Res Social Adm Pharm. 2023 Jun;19(6):896-905. doi: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2023.02.007. Epub 2023 Feb 17.
7
Computerized history-taking improves data quality for clinical decision-making-Comparison of EHR and computer-acquired history data in patients with chest pain.计算机化问诊提高了临床决策的数据质量——胸痛患者电子病历和计算机获取病史数据的比较。
PLoS One. 2021 Sep 27;16(9):e0257677. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0257677. eCollection 2021.
8
Assessing Data Adequacy for High Blood Pressure Clinical Decision Support: A Quantitative Analysis.评估高血压临床决策支持的数据充分性:一项定量分析。
Appl Clin Inform. 2021 Aug;12(4):710-720. doi: 10.1055/s-0041-1732401. Epub 2021 Aug 4.
9
Coding Systems for Clinical Decision Support: Theoretical and Real-World Comparative Analysis.临床决策支持的编码系统:理论与现实世界的比较分析
JMIR Form Res. 2020 Oct 21;4(10):e16094. doi: 10.2196/16094.
10
Human- Versus Machine Learning-Based Triage Using Digitalized Patient Histories in Primary Care: Comparative Study.在初级保健中使用数字化患者病史进行基于人与机器学习的分诊:比较研究
JMIR Med Inform. 2020 Sep 3;8(9):e18930. doi: 10.2196/18930.

本文引用的文献

1
Effects of computerized clinical decision support systems on practitioner performance and patient outcomes: a systematic review.计算机化临床决策支持系统对从业者表现和患者结局的影响:一项系统综述。
JAMA. 2005 Mar 9;293(10):1223-38. doi: 10.1001/jama.293.10.1223.
2
Characteristics and consequences of drug allergy alert overrides in a computerized physician order entry system.计算机化医师医嘱录入系统中药物过敏警报 override 的特征及后果
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2004 Nov-Dec;11(6):482-91. doi: 10.1197/jamia.M1556. Epub 2004 Aug 6.
3
Multiple risk factors interventions. Are we up to the challenge?
Am J Prev Med. 2004 Aug;27(2 Suppl):102-3. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2004.04.016.
4
Predicting the risk of gastrointestinal bleeding due to nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs: NSAID electronic assessment of risk.预测非甾体抗炎药所致胃肠道出血风险:非甾体抗炎药风险电子评估
J Rheumatol. 2003 Oct;30(10):2241-4.
5
Rates of serious gastrointestinal events from low dose use of acetylsalicylic acid, acetaminophen, and ibuprofen in patients with osteoarthritis and rheumatoid arthritis.骨关节炎和类风湿关节炎患者低剂量使用乙酰水杨酸、对乙酰氨基酚和布洛芬导致严重胃肠道事件的发生率。
J Rheumatol. 2003 Oct;30(10):2226-33.
6
Improving safety with information technology.利用信息技术提高安全性。
N Engl J Med. 2003 Jun 19;348(25):2526-34. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsa020847.
7
Using standardised patients to measure physicians' practice: validation study using audio recordings.使用标准化患者来衡量医生的诊疗行为:基于录音的验证性研究
BMJ. 2002 Sep 28;325(7366):679. doi: 10.1136/bmj.325.7366.679.
8
Measuring the quality of medical records: a method for comparing completeness and correctness of clinical encounter data.衡量医疗记录的质量:一种比较临床诊疗数据完整性和正确性的方法。
Proc AMIA Symp. 2001:408-12.
9
Assessing the quality of clinical data in a computer-based record for calculating the pneumonia severity index.评估基于计算机记录的临床数据质量以计算肺炎严重程度指数。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2000 Jan-Feb;7(1):55-65. doi: 10.1136/jamia.2000.0070055.
10
Accuracy of data in computer-based patient records.基于计算机的患者记录中数据的准确性。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 1997 Sep-Oct;4(5):342-55. doi: 10.1136/jamia.1997.0040342.

门诊环境中的数据质量:对临床决策支持系统的影响。

Data quality in the outpatient setting: impact on clinical decision support systems.

作者信息

Berner Eta S, Kasiraman Ramkumar K, Yu Feliciano, Ray Midge N, Houston Thomas K

机构信息

University of Alabama at Birmingham, AL, USA.

出版信息

AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2005;2005:41-5.

PMID:16778998
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC1560426/
Abstract

Clinical decision support system (CDSS) performance may vary with the quality of the input data. We assessed the impact of medical record completeness and accuracy on a CDSS that provides risk assessment for gastrointestinal bleeding and recommends therapy when prescribing NSAIDs. We examined the documentation of six data elements in the medical record and the impact on the performance of the CDSS. We reviewed 178 transcribed clinical encounters from standardized patients with predefined clinical histories. Results showed that the mean completeness score across all encounters was .34. The mean correctness score for those elements present was .94. When the available data was input into the CDSS, the missing data elements resulted in inappropriate and unsafe recommendations in almost 77% of the encounters. The results show that important gaps in the medical record can affect the accuracy of a CDSS designed to improve safe prescribing.

摘要

临床决策支持系统(CDSS)的性能可能会因输入数据的质量而有所不同。我们评估了病历完整性和准确性对一个为胃肠道出血提供风险评估并在开具非甾体抗炎药(NSAIDs)时推荐治疗方案的CDSS的影响。我们检查了病历中六个数据元素的记录情况以及对CDSS性能的影响。我们回顾了178例来自具有预定义临床病史的标准化患者的转录临床会诊记录。结果显示,所有会诊记录的平均完整性得分为0.34。存在的那些元素的平均正确性得分为0.94。当将可用数据输入CDSS时,在几乎77%的会诊记录中,缺失的数据元素导致了不恰当和不安全的建议。结果表明,病历中的重要空白可能会影响旨在改善安全用药的CDSS的准确性。