Nijdam J R, Doorschot C H, van Bavel L P, Loonen A J
Psychiatric Hospital Reinier van Arkel, Vught, The Netherlands.
Pharmacopsychiatry. 1992 May;25(3):145-9. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-1014395.
Twenty patients who had become accustomed to a stable oral carbamazepine dose participated in an open, randomized, two-centre, cross-over study, in which ordinary tablets and Divitabs (a new sustained release preparation) were compared. Pharmacokinetic parameters, seizure control, effects on the behavioral state, and tolerability were considered. A smaller Area Under the Curve (AUC) during the Divitabs period was the only pharmacokinetic parameter with a significant difference (p less than 0.05). However, all patients with peak/trough carbamazepine serum level ratios of at least 1.30 after the intake of the normal tablet-form (n = 9) showed a smaller peak/trough ratio during the Divitabs period. No remarkable differences were found between the normal carbamazepine preparation and Divitabs regarding seizure frequency and tolerability. The behavioral state improved in four patients during the Divitabs period, whereas no enhancement was noticed during the normal-tablet period in any of the subjects. Although this study produced no evidence that carbamazepine Divitabs were at all advantageous for the trial population in general, some of the pharmacokinetic results suggest that a subgroup of the patients would benefit from changing from the normal tablet-form to Divitabs. However, even in this subgroup, the usage of Divitabs was not shown to result in obvious clinical benefits.
20名已习惯稳定口服卡马西平剂量的患者参与了一项开放、随机、双中心、交叉研究,该研究比较了普通片剂和Divitabs(一种新型缓释制剂)。研究考虑了药代动力学参数、癫痫控制、对行为状态的影响和耐受性。Divitabs期的曲线下面积(AUC)较小是唯一有显著差异的药代动力学参数(p小于0.05)。然而,所有服用普通片剂后卡马西平血清峰谷水平比至少为1.30的患者(n = 9)在Divitabs期的峰谷比都较小。在癫痫发作频率和耐受性方面,普通卡马西平制剂和Divitabs之间未发现显著差异。在Divitabs期,4名患者的行为状态有所改善,而在普通片剂期,任何受试者均未观察到改善。虽然这项研究没有证据表明卡马西平Divitabs对整个试验人群有任何优势,但一些药代动力学结果表明,部分患者亚组从普通片剂形式改为Divitabs可能会受益。然而,即使在这个亚组中,Divitabs的使用也未显示出明显的临床益处。