Hill William G, Barton Nicholas H, Turelli Michael
Institute of Evolutionary Biology, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh EH9 3JT, UK.
Theor Popul Biol. 2006 Aug;70(1):56-62. doi: 10.1016/j.tpb.2005.10.001. Epub 2005 Dec 19.
For a model of diallelic loci with arbitrary epistasis, Barton and Turelli [2004. Effects of genetic drift on variance components under a general model of epistasis. Evolution 58, 2111-2132] gave results for variances among and within replicate lines obtained by inbreeding without selection. Here, we discuss the relation between their population genetic methods and classical quantitative genetic arguments. In particular, we consider the case of no dominance using classical identity by descent arguments, which generalizes their results from two alleles to multiple alleles. To clarify the connections between the alternative methods, we obtain the same results using an intermediate method, which explicitly identifies the statistical effects of sets of loci. We also discuss the effects of population bottlenecks on covariances among relatives.
对于具有任意上位性的双等位基因位点模型,巴顿和图雷利[2004年。在一般上位性模型下遗传漂变对方差成分的影响。《进化》58卷,2111 - 2132页]给出了通过无选择的近亲繁殖获得的重复品系间和品系内方差的结果。在这里,我们讨论他们的群体遗传方法与经典数量遗传论点之间的关系。特别是,我们使用经典的系谱同一性论点来考虑无显性的情况,这将他们的结果从两个等位基因推广到多个等位基因。为了阐明不同方法之间的联系,我们使用一种中间方法得到了相同的结果,该方法明确确定了位点集的统计效应。我们还讨论了群体瓶颈对亲属间协方差的影响。