• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

环状软骨可触及性作为床旁气管切开术的选择标准。

Cricoid palpability as a selection criterion for bedside tracheostomy.

作者信息

Husein Omar F, Massick Douglas D

机构信息

Department of Otolaryngology, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA.

出版信息

Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2005 Dec;133(6):839-44. doi: 10.1016/j.otohns.2005.08.008.

DOI:10.1016/j.otohns.2005.08.008
PMID:16360500
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To prospectively evaluate the significance of cricoid cartilage palpability as a selection criterion for bedside tracheostomy and to prospectively compare a cohort of patients undergoing bedside tracheostomy with another cohort receiving operating room tracheostomy.

STUDY DESIGN/SETTING: Prospective trial comparing 2 cohorts of patients receiving tracheostomies at a tertiary care center (university hospital). In all, 220 consecutive intubated patients selected for elective tracheostomy were enrolled. Of them, 134 patients had palpable cricoid cartilage and underwent open surgical tracheostomy at the bedside. The remaining 68 patients received open surgical tracheostomies in the operating room. Demographic data, patient anatomic features, and perioperative complications were prospectively recorded. There were no statistically significant differences in age, gender, reason for admission, indication for tracheostomy, Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II score, number of days intubated, or time required to perform the procedure for those patients whose tracheostomies were performed in the operating room versus the intensive care unit.

RESULTS

Patients with a palpable cricoid cartilage had a significantly reduced perioperative complication rate compared with those without a palpable cricoid cartilage (2% vs 22%, P < 0.001). Comparison of cervical girth, mental-to-sternum distance, and thyroid-notch-to-sternum distance showed no significant difference between the 2 groups and did not further define selection criteria.

CONCLUSION

This investigation prospectively confirms the safety of bedside tracheostomy placement in properly selected patients. Complication incidences are defined for open surgical tracheostomy at the bedside and in the operating room. Palpability of the cricoid cartilage has significant value as a selection criterion for bedside tracheostomy.

SIGNIFICANCE

These findings will aid in the development of protocols and pathways for surgical airway management in critically ill patients to maximize cost-effective, high-quality care.

摘要

目的

前瞻性评估环状软骨可触及性作为床旁气管切开术选择标准的意义,并前瞻性比较一组接受床旁气管切开术的患者与另一组接受手术室气管切开术的患者。

研究设计/地点:在一家三级医疗中心(大学医院)对两组接受气管切开术的患者进行前瞻性试验。总共纳入了220例连续入选接受择期气管切开术的插管患者。其中,134例患者环状软骨可触及,在床旁接受开放式手术气管切开术。其余68例患者在手术室接受开放式手术气管切开术。前瞻性记录人口统计学数据、患者解剖特征和围手术期并发症。对于在手术室与重症监护病房接受气管切开术的患者,在年龄、性别、入院原因、气管切开术指征、急性生理与慢性健康状况评估II评分、插管天数或手术所需时间方面,没有统计学上的显著差异。

结果

与环状软骨不可触及的患者相比,环状软骨可触及的患者围手术期并发症发生率显著降低(2%对22%,P<0.001)。两组之间的颈围、颏胸距离和甲状软骨切迹至胸骨距离比较无显著差异,也未进一步明确选择标准。

结论

本研究前瞻性证实了在适当选择的患者中进行床旁气管切开术的安全性。确定了床旁和手术室开放式手术气管切开术的并发症发生率。环状软骨的可触及性作为床旁气管切开术的选择标准具有重要价值。

意义

这些发现将有助于制定危重病患者手术气道管理的方案和路径,以实现成本效益高、质量优的护理。

相似文献

1
Cricoid palpability as a selection criterion for bedside tracheostomy.环状软骨可触及性作为床旁气管切开术的选择标准。
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2005 Dec;133(6):839-44. doi: 10.1016/j.otohns.2005.08.008.
2
Bedside tracheostomy in the intensive care unit: a prospective randomized trial comparing open surgical tracheostomy with endoscopically guided percutaneous dilational tracheotomy.重症监护病房中的床边气管切开术:一项比较开放手术气管切开术与内镜引导下经皮扩张气管切开术的前瞻性随机试验。
Laryngoscope. 2001 Mar;111(3):494-500. doi: 10.1097/00005537-200103000-00021.
3
Comparison of safety and cost of percutaneous versus surgical tracheostomy.经皮气管切开术与外科气管切开术的安全性及成本比较。
Am Surg. 2001 Jan;67(1):54-60.
4
Endoscopic percutaneous dilatational tracheotomy: a prospective evaluation of 500 consecutive cases.内镜下经皮扩张气管切开术:500例连续病例的前瞻性评估。
Laryngoscope. 2005 Oct;115(10 Pt 2):1-30. doi: 10.1097/01.MLG.0000163744.89688.E8.
5
Open versus percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy: efficacy and cost analysis.开放性与经皮扩张气管切开术:疗效与成本分析
Am Surg. 2001 Apr;67(4):297-301; discussion 301-2.
6
Preferred route of tracheostomy--percutaneous versus open at the bedside: a randomized, prospective study in the surgical intensive care unit.气管切开术的首选途径——经皮穿刺与床边开放手术:外科重症监护病房的一项随机前瞻性研究
Am Surg. 1999 Feb;65(2):142-6.
7
Elective bedside tracheostomy in the intensive care unit.
J Am Coll Surg. 1996 Jul;183(1):51-5.
8
An analysis of time and staff utilization for open versus percutaneous tracheostomies.开放手术与经皮气管切开术的时间及人员利用情况分析。
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2003 Jan;128(1):109-14. doi: 10.1067/mhn.2003.18.
9
Percutaneous versus surgical tracheostomy: A randomized controlled study with long-term follow-up.经皮与外科气管切开术:一项长期随访的随机对照研究。
Crit Care Med. 2006 Aug;34(8):2145-52. doi: 10.1097/01.CCM.0000229882.09677.FD.
10
Comparison of open versus bedside percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy in the cardiothoracic surgical patient: outcomes and financial analysis.心胸外科手术患者开放性与床旁经皮扩张气管切开术的比较:结果与财务分析
Ann Thorac Surg. 2005 Jun;79(6):1879-85. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2004.10.042.

引用本文的文献

1
Ultrasound guided percutaneous dilatation tracheotomy (US-PDT) to prevent potentially life-threatening complications: A case report.超声引导下经皮扩张气管切开术(US-PDT)预防潜在危及生命的并发症:一例报告。
Int J Surg Case Rep. 2020;77S(Suppl):S125-S128. doi: 10.1016/j.ijscr.2020.09.031. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
2
A Network Comparative Meta-analysis of Percutaneous Dilatational Tracheostomies Using Anatomic Landmarks, Bronchoscopic, and Ultrasound Guidance Versus Open Surgical Tracheostomy.经皮扩张气管切开术与开放性外科气管切开术的解剖标志、支气管镜和超声引导的网络比较荟萃分析。
Lung. 2019 Jun;197(3):267-275. doi: 10.1007/s00408-019-00230-7. Epub 2019 Apr 24.
3
The role of ultrasound in percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy.
超声在经皮扩张气管切开术中的作用。
Australas J Ultrasound Med. 2012 Nov;15(4):143-148. doi: 10.1002/j.2205-0140.2012.tb00197.x. Epub 2015 Dec 31.
4
Analysis of morbidity, mortality, and risk factors of tracheostomy-related complications in patients with oral and maxillofacial cancer.口腔颌面癌患者气管切开术相关并发症的发病率、死亡率及危险因素分析。
Maxillofac Plast Reconstr Surg. 2016 Aug 25;38(1):32. doi: 10.1186/s40902-016-0078-9. eCollection 2016 Dec.
5
Tracheostomy in Pediatric Intensive Care Unit: When and Where?儿科重症监护病房中的气管切开术:时机与地点?
Iran J Pediatr. 2016 Feb;26(1):e2283. doi: 10.5812/ijp.2283. Epub 2016 Jan 30.
6
Use of ultrasound guidance to improve the safety of percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy: a literature review.使用超声引导提高经皮扩张气管切开术的安全性:文献综述
Crit Care. 2015 May 18;19(1):229. doi: 10.1186/s13054-015-0942-5.
7
Issues of critical airway management (Which anesthesia; which surgical airway?).关键气道管理问题(采用哪种麻醉方式;哪种外科气道方式?)
J Emerg Trauma Shock. 2012 Oct;5(4):279-84. doi: 10.4103/0974-2700.102353.
8
The critical airway in adults: The facts.成人的关键气道:事实
J Emerg Trauma Shock. 2012 Apr;5(2):153-9. doi: 10.4103/0974-2700.96485.