Suppr超能文献

气管切开术的首选途径——经皮穿刺与床边开放手术:外科重症监护病房的一项随机前瞻性研究

Preferred route of tracheostomy--percutaneous versus open at the bedside: a randomized, prospective study in the surgical intensive care unit.

作者信息

Porter J M, Ivatury R R

机构信息

University of California, Davis-East Bay, Oakland 94602, USA.

出版信息

Am Surg. 1999 Feb;65(2):142-6.

PMID:9926749
Abstract

Percutaneous tracheostomy has been touted as the preferred route of tracheostomy. However, to date, no prospective randomized study comparing bedside percutaneous (BP) to bedside open (BO) tracheostomy has been performed. Surgical intensive care unit (sICU) patients were randomized to receive either a BP or a BO tracheostomy. Patients were monitored for complications. Procedure time was documented. A group of medical ICU patients had open tracheostomies in the operating room (OR) and served as contemporaneous controls. Over 11 months, there were 24 surgical ICU patients randomized to receive either BP tracheostomy or BO tracheostomy, 12 in each group. Forty-six medical ICU patients received standard open tracheostomy in the OR. The number of ventilator days before placing the tracheostomy was similar between the BP and BO groups, 9.8 and 12.4, respectively. The clinical indications for tracheostomy were similar between the two groups. The procedure time for the BP group was 14.5 minutes, whereas 25.2 minutes for the BO group. There were no postprocedure complications in the BP and BO groups. There was a trend toward more complications in the BP group, including the loss of the airway, leading to death. The procedure time and complications were similar between the BO and OR groups. These data do not support that BP tracheostomy is the preferred route of tracheostomy when compared with BO tracheostomy. These data support that experienced surgical intensivists can perform BO tracheostomies with lower risk and cost, when compared with BP tracheostomy.

摘要

经皮气管切开术一直被吹捧为气管切开术的首选途径。然而,迄今为止,尚未进行过将床边经皮(BP)气管切开术与床边开放(BO)气管切开术进行比较的前瞻性随机研究。外科重症监护病房(sICU)的患者被随机分配接受BP或BO气管切开术。对患者进行并发症监测,并记录手术时间。一组内科重症监护病房(medical ICU)的患者在手术室(OR)接受开放气管切开术,并作为同期对照。在11个月的时间里,有24名外科重症监护病房患者被随机分配接受BP气管切开术或BO气管切开术,每组12人。46名内科重症监护病房患者在手术室接受了标准的开放气管切开术。BP组和BO组在气管切开术前的机械通气天数相似,分别为9.8天和12.4天。两组气管切开术的临床指征相似。BP组的手术时间为14.5分钟,而BO组为25.2分钟。BP组和BO组术后均无并发症。BP组有出现更多并发症的趋势,包括气道丧失导致死亡。BO组和手术室组的手术时间和并发症相似。与BO气管切开术相比,这些数据不支持BP气管切开术是气管切开术的首选途径。与BP气管切开术相比,这些数据支持经验丰富的外科重症医学专家进行BO气管切开术时风险和成本更低。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验