Minasian-Batmanian Laura C, Lingard Jennifer, Prosser Michael
School of Biomedical Sciences, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Sydney, East St., Lidcombe, NSW, 2141, Australia.
Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2005 Nov;10(4):279-90. doi: 10.1007/s10459-005-1404-7.
Student approaches to learning vary from surface approaches to meaningful, deep learning practices. Differences in approach may be related to students' conceptions of the subject, perceptions of the learning environment, prior study experiences and performance on assessment. This study aims to explore entering students' conceptions of the unit they are about to study and how they intend to approach their studies. It involved a survey of 203 (of 250) first year students in a cross disciplinary unit in the Faculty of Health Sciences. They were asked to complete an open-ended response survey, including questions on what they thought they needed to do to learn biochemistry and what they thought the study of biochemistry was about. A phenomenographic methodology was used to identify categories of description for the questions. The paper will describe the categories in detail, the structural relationship between the categories and the distribution of responses within categories. The study reports a relationship between conception of the topic and approaches to learning. Students with more complex and coherent conceptions of the topic report that they were more likely to adopt deeper approaches to study than those with more fragmented conceptions. However, compared to previous studies, a surprisingly high proportion of students with more cohesive conceptions still intended to adopt more surface approaches. This may reflect the particular context of their learning, namely in a compulsory unit involving material for which most students have minimal background and difficulty seeing its relevance. Implications for teaching such foundation material are discussed.
学生的学习方法各不相同,从表面学习方法到有意义的深度学习实践。方法上的差异可能与学生对学科的理解、对学习环境的认知、先前的学习经历以及评估表现有关。本研究旨在探讨即将入学的学生对他们即将学习的单元的理解,以及他们打算如何进行学习。该研究对健康科学学院一个跨学科单元的250名一年级学生中的203名进行了调查。他们被要求完成一项开放式回应调查,包括关于他们认为学习生物化学需要做什么以及他们认为生物化学研究是什么的问题。采用现象学方法来确定问题的描述类别。本文将详细描述这些类别、类别之间的结构关系以及类别内的回答分布情况。该研究报告了对主题的理解与学习方法之间的关系。对主题有更复杂和连贯理解的学生报告说,他们比那些理解更零散的学生更有可能采用更深入的学习方法。然而,与之前的研究相比,有更连贯理解的学生中,仍有高得出奇的比例打算采用更表面的方法。这可能反映了他们学习的特定背景,即在一个必修单元中,涉及的材料大多数学生背景知识极少,且难以看出其相关性。文中讨论了对教授此类基础材料的启示。