Ruohoniemi Mirja, Parpala Anna, Lindblom-Ylänne Sari, Katajavuori Nina
University Pedagogy, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Helsinki, Finland.
J Vet Med Educ. 2010 Fall;37(3):282-8. doi: 10.3138/jvme.37.3.282.
The relationships among veterinary students' approaches to learning, perceptions of the teaching-learning environment, and study success were evaluated in a demanding, discipline-based curriculum. The aim was to elicit elements for improving student counseling. As part of a large multidisciplinary survey, 36 third-year students (74% response rate) answered a modified version of the Experiences of Teaching and Learning Questionnaire in 2006. In this study, the authors used students' responses to questions regarding examinations and the progress of studies. In addition, students were classified in the large survey into four clusters according to their approaches to studying. Study success was evaluated by exploring the number of study credits students had earned and their grade point averages. The differences in study success between the clusters were not statistically significant, but, in general, students applying a deep approach were most successful, whereas unorganized students applying a deep approach showed the largest variation in study progress. The most commonly mentioned factors for enhancing or impeding study progress were related to the curriculum and to the students' actions or experiences. Unorganized students applying a deep approach seemed to suffer the most from the workload and pressure of progressing in their studies according to a predetermined timetable. These students were also most unaware of the examinations' demands. The findings suggested that, in addition to curriculum development, there is a need to explicitly make students aware of their approaches to learning and to support the development of their study practices.
在一门要求严格、基于学科的课程中,对兽医专业学生的学习方法、对教学环境的认知以及学习成绩之间的关系进行了评估。目的是找出有助于改进学生辅导工作的要素。作为一项大型多学科调查的一部分,36名三年级学生(回复率为74%)在2006年回答了一份修改后的《教与学体验问卷》。在本研究中,作者利用了学生对有关考试和学习进度问题的回答。此外,在大型调查中,学生根据其学习方法被分为四类。通过探究学生获得的学分数及其平均绩点来评估学习成绩。不同类别学生在学习成绩上的差异无统计学意义,但总体而言,采用深层学习方法的学生最为成功,而采用深层学习方法的无组织学生在学习进度上的差异最大。提及最多的促进或阻碍学习进度的因素与课程以及学生的行为或经历有关。采用深层学习方法的无组织学生似乎在按照预定时间表推进学业时,受工作量和压力的影响最大。这些学生对考试要求也最不了解。研究结果表明,除了课程开发外,还需要让学生明确意识到自己的学习方法,并支持他们改进学习方法。