Groves Michele
School of Medicine, University of Queensland, 4006, Herston, QLD, Australia.
Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2005 Nov;10(4):315-26. doi: 10.1007/s10459-005-8556-3.
To assess the influence of a graduate-entry PBL curriculum on individual learning style; and to investigate the relationship between learning style, academic achievement and clinical reasoning skill.
Subjects were first-year medical students completed the Study Process Questionnaire at the commencement, and again, at the end of the academic year when they also completed the Diagnostic Thinking Inventory, a measure of clinical reasoning skill. Subjects were classified on the basis of their predominant learning approach, and this was correlated with examination results and DTI score.
There was a net shift in predominant learning approach away from deep learning towards a more surface approach over the period of the study, as well as a significant decrease in deep-learning scores. There was a statistically significant association between deep learning score and clinical reasoning skill as shown by total DTI score as well as on the structure of knowledge subscale. No correlation was found between learning approach and examination results.
Although these results suggest that a deep learning approach may be beneficial in the development of clinical reasoning skill through its potential to enhance the development of knowledge representations, the substantial shift towards a surface learning approach brings into question previous conclusions that PBL curricula foster a deep approach to learning, and suggests that other factors, such as work load may be more determinants of learning approach than curriculum type. Taken together, these findings emphasise the context-dependent nature of learning approach as well as the importance of assessment as a driver of student learning and strongly suggest that further work to determine precisely the factors which influence learning approach in medical students is urgently needed.
评估研究生入学基于问题的学习(PBL)课程对个体学习风格的影响;并研究学习风格、学业成绩与临床推理技能之间的关系。
受试者为一年级医学生,在学年开始时完成学习过程问卷,学年结束时再次完成该问卷,同时他们还完成了临床推理技能测量工具——诊断性思维量表。根据受试者占主导的学习方法进行分类,并将其与考试成绩和诊断性思维量表得分相关联。
在研究期间,占主导的学习方法出现了净转变,从深度学习转向更为表面化的方法,同时深度学习得分显著下降。深度学习得分与临床推理技能之间存在统计学上的显著关联,这在诊断性思维量表总分以及知识结构子量表上均有体现。未发现学习方法与考试成绩之间存在相关性。
尽管这些结果表明深度学习方法可能因其具有增强知识表征发展的潜力而有利于临床推理技能的发展,但向表面学习方法的实质性转变使之前关于PBL课程促进深度学习方法这一结论受到质疑,并表明其他因素,如工作量等,可能比课程类型更能决定学习方法。综上所述,这些发现强调了学习方法的情境依赖性以及评估作为学生学习驱动力的重要性,并强烈表明迫切需要进一步开展工作以精确确定影响医学生学习方法的因素。