Luostarinen Liisa, Heinonen Taina, Luostarinen Markku, Salmivaara Annikki
Department of Neurology, Päijät-Häme Central Hospital, Keskussairaalankatu 7, FIN-15850 Lahti, Finland.
J Headache Pain. 2005 Oct;6(5):400-4. doi: 10.1007/s10194-005-0235-5. Epub 2005 Aug 1.
Post-lumbar puncture headache is a frequent clinical problem. Needle design is expected to reduce post-puncture headache. In this study, we compared two different lumbar puncture needle designs in diagnostic lumbar puncture and analysed post-dural puncture headache (PDPH) and social and economical harm associated with the diagnostic lumbar puncture procedure. This prospective, controlled study consisted of 80 consecutive adult patients requiring elective diagnostic lumbar puncture due to various neurological symptoms. Lumbar puncture was completed either with Spinocan 22 G sharp bevel needle or Whitacre 22G pencil point needle. Patients were asked about previous headache symptoms and pain provoked by puncture. One week after the lumbar puncture all patients were interviewed by telephone and occurrence and type of headache, headache intensity, medication and frequency of impairment in activities of daily living were asked. Need for epidural blood patch was also recorded. Thirty-three of 78 (42%) patients experienced headache after diagnostic lumbar puncture and in 26 (33%) the headache could be classified as PDPH. There were no statistically significant differences between needle types in the frequency of common headache, PDPH, puncture pain intensity, need for epidural blood patch or sick leave. Also, there were no other complications except local back pain or headache. In this study, the needle design did not affect the frequency of PDPH. Also, PDPH was common, occurring in 33% cases and caused a considerable amount of disturbance in daily activities. Seeking help for this condition was insufficient and only part of these PDPH patients were treated with epidural blood patch.
腰椎穿刺后头痛是一个常见的临床问题。人们期望通过针具设计来减少穿刺后头痛。在本研究中,我们比较了两种不同设计的腰椎穿刺针在诊断性腰椎穿刺中的应用情况,并分析了硬膜穿刺后头痛(PDPH)以及与诊断性腰椎穿刺操作相关的社会和经济危害。这项前瞻性对照研究纳入了80例因各种神经系统症状而需要进行择期诊断性腰椎穿刺的成年患者。腰椎穿刺分别使用Spinocan 22G锐缘针或Whitacre 22G笔尖针完成。询问患者既往头痛症状以及穿刺引发的疼痛情况。腰椎穿刺一周后,通过电话对所有患者进行访谈,询问头痛的发生情况、类型、强度、用药情况以及日常生活活动受限的频率。还记录了硬膜外血贴的需求情况。78例患者中有33例(42%)在诊断性腰椎穿刺后出现头痛,其中26例(33%)的头痛可归类为PDPH。在普通头痛、PDPH的发生率、穿刺疼痛强度、硬膜外血贴的需求或病假方面,两种针具类型之间没有统计学上的显著差异。此外,除了局部背痛或头痛外,没有其他并发症。在本研究中,针具设计并未影响PDPH的发生率。而且,PDPH很常见,发生率为33%,并对日常活动造成了相当大的干扰。针对这种情况寻求帮助的情况并不理想,只有部分PDPH患者接受了硬膜外血贴治疗。