Suppr超能文献

一家三级产科麻醉科室十年间意外硬膜穿破及硬膜穿破后头痛的经验

Ten years of experience with accidental dural puncture and post-dural puncture headache in a tertiary obstetric anaesthesia department.

作者信息

Van de Velde M, Schepers R, Berends N, Vandermeersch E, De Buck F

机构信息

Department of Anaesthesiology, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, University Hospitals Gasthuisberg, Leuven, Belgium.

出版信息

Int J Obstet Anesth. 2008 Oct;17(4):329-35. doi: 10.1016/j.ijoa.2007.04.009. Epub 2008 Aug 8.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Accidental dural puncture (ADP) and post-dural puncture headache (PDPH) are important complications of obstetric regional anaesthesia.

METHODS

Between January 1997 and October 2006 in our tertiary obstetric referral centre 17 198 neuraxial blocks were recorded; 965 epidural, 16193 combined spinal-epidural and 40 spinal. Records of all parturients who experienced either ADP or PDPH were reviewed.

RESULTS

There were 89 ADPs (0.5%), 55 observed and 34 in which PDPH followed unrecognised dural puncture. Following known ADP, 28 women had epidural catheters re-sited at a different lumbar interspace and 27 had intrathecal catheters for at least 24 h. Thirty-one women developed PDPH after observed ADP; the incidence of PDPH was similar after puncture with needle and catheter, after epidural and CSE techniques, after 27- and 29-gauge pencil-point spinal needles and after spinal and epidural catheter insertion (61% vs 52%; P>0.05). All headaches presented within 72 h. A blood patch was needed in 26/55 women after known ADP and 27/34 unrecognised ADP. A repeat blood patch was needed in 8 (15%).

DISCUSSION

The incidence of ADP, PDPH, blood patching and repeat blood patching is similar to previous studies. Many ADPs are unrecognised during epidural insertion. CSE does not appear to increase the risk of ADP or PDPH; 29-gauge rather than 27-gauge pencil-point spinal needles conferred no benefit. Inserting the epidural catheter intrathecally did not significantly reduce the incidence of PDPH and blood patching in our series.

摘要

背景

意外硬膜穿破(ADP)和硬膜穿破后头痛(PDPH)是产科区域麻醉的重要并发症。

方法

1997年1月至2006年10月期间,在我们的三级产科转诊中心记录了17198例神经轴阻滞;965例硬膜外阻滞,16193例腰麻-硬膜外联合阻滞和40例腰麻。对所有发生ADP或PDPH的产妇记录进行回顾。

结果

发生89例ADP(0.5%),其中55例被发现,34例在未识别硬膜穿破后发生PDPH。在已知ADP后,28名女性在不同腰椎间隙重新置入硬膜外导管,27名女性置入鞘内导管至少24小时。31名女性在被发现ADP后发生PDPH;穿刺针和导管穿刺后、硬膜外和腰麻-硬膜外联合技术后、27号和29号笔尖式腰麻针穿刺后以及腰麻和硬膜外导管置入后PDPH的发生率相似(61%对52%;P>0.05)。所有头痛均在72小时内出现。已知ADP后,26/55的女性需要进行血补丁治疗,未识别ADP后27/34的女性需要进行血补丁治疗。8例(15%)需要重复血补丁治疗。

讨论

ADP、PDPH、血补丁治疗和重复血补丁治疗的发生率与先前研究相似。许多ADP在硬膜外穿刺过程中未被识别。腰麻-硬膜外联合阻滞似乎不会增加ADP或PDPH的风险;29号而非27号笔尖式腰麻针并无益处。在我们的系列研究中,将硬膜外导管置入鞘内并不能显著降低PDPH和血补丁治疗的发生率。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验