• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

保护性反射之间的区分:心脏防御和惊吓反应。

Differentiation between protective reflexes: cardiac defense and startle.

作者信息

Ramírez Isabel, Sánchez María B, Fernández María Carmen, Lipp Ottmar V, Vila Jaime

机构信息

Faculty of Psychology, University of Granada, Granada, Spain.

出版信息

Psychophysiology. 2005 Nov;42(6):732-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8986.2005.00362.x.

DOI:10.1111/j.1469-8986.2005.00362.x
PMID:16364069
Abstract

Rise time and duration are two parametric characteristics of the eliciting stimulus frequently used to differentiate among psychophysiological reflexes. The present research varied the duration (study 1) and rise time (study 2) of an intense acoustic stimulus to dissociate cardiac defense and cardiac startle using the eyeblink response as the external criterion of startle. In each study, 100 participants were presented with five white noise stimuli of 105 dB under one of five duration (50, 100, 250, 500, and 1000 ms) or rise time (0, 24, 48, 96, and 240 ms) conditions. Cardiac defense was affected by stimulus duration, present only in the 500- and 1000-ms conditions, but not by stimulus rise time, present in all rise time conditions. Rise time affected blink startle, but did not selectively alter the short latency accelerative component of the heart rate response, thus questioning whether it reflects startle.

摘要

上升时间和持续时间是诱发刺激的两个参数特征,常用于区分心理生理反射。本研究通过改变强烈听觉刺激的持续时间(研究1)和上升时间(研究2),以眨眼反应作为惊吓的外部标准,来区分心脏防御反应和心脏惊吓反应。在每项研究中,100名参与者在五种持续时间(50、100、250、500和1000毫秒)或上升时间(0、24、48、96和240毫秒)条件之一的情况下,接受了五次105分贝的白噪声刺激。心脏防御反应受刺激持续时间的影响,仅在500毫秒和1000毫秒的条件下出现,但不受刺激上升时间的影响,在所有上升时间条件下均存在。上升时间影响眨眼惊吓反应,但并未选择性地改变心率反应的短潜伏期加速成分,因此对其是否反映惊吓反应提出了质疑。

相似文献

1
Differentiation between protective reflexes: cardiac defense and startle.保护性反射之间的区分:心脏防御和惊吓反应。
Psychophysiology. 2005 Nov;42(6):732-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8986.2005.00362.x.
2
[Effect of manipulating the risetime of an acoustic stimulus on two protective reflexes: cardiac defense and motor startle].[操控听觉刺激上升时间对两种保护性反射的影响:心脏防御和运动惊跳]
Psicothema. 2006 Nov;18(4):717-23.
3
The effect of startle reflex habituation on cardiac defense: interference between two protective reflexes.惊吓反射习惯化对心脏防御的影响:两种保护性反射之间的干扰。
Int J Psychophysiol. 2008 Jul;69(1):27-32. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2008.02.007. Epub 2008 Mar 4.
4
Cardiac modulation of startle: effects on eye blink and higher cognitive processing.惊吓反应的心脏调节:对眨眼及更高层次认知加工的影响。
Brain Cogn. 2009 Dec;71(3):265-71. doi: 10.1016/j.bandc.2009.08.002. Epub 2009 Aug 31.
5
Startle blink facilitation during the go signal of a reaction time task is not affected by movement preparation or attention to the go signal.反应时任务的执行信号期间的惊跳眨眼易化不受动作准备或对执行信号的注意的影响。
Neurosci Lett. 2007 Nov 5;427(2):94-8. doi: 10.1016/j.neulet.2007.09.018. Epub 2007 Sep 19.
6
The effect of warning stimulus modality on blink startle modification in reaction time tasks.警告刺激方式对反应时任务中眨眼惊吓修正的影响。
Psychophysiology. 2000 Jan;37(1):55-64.
7
Habituation and sensitization of protective reflexes: dissociation between cardiac defense and eye-blink startle.保护性反射的习惯化与敏感化:心脏防御与眨眼惊跳之间的分离
Biol Psychol. 2009 Jul;81(3):192-9. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2009.04.006. Epub 2009 May 3.
8
Reaction time facilitation by acoustic task-irrelevant stimuli is not related to startle.与任务无关的听觉刺激对反应时间的促进作用与惊吓无关。
Neurosci Lett. 2006 Dec 1;409(2):124-7. doi: 10.1016/j.neulet.2006.09.025. Epub 2006 Sep 28.
9
Lateralization effects on the cardiac modulation of acoustic startle eye blink.声学惊跳眨眼的心脏调制中的偏侧化效应。
Biol Psychol. 2009 Mar;80(3):287-91. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2008.10.006. Epub 2008 Oct 30.
10
Effects of background noise on the human startle reflex and prepulse inhibition.背景噪声对人类惊吓反射和前脉冲抑制的影响。
Psychophysiology. 2005 May;42(3):298-305. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8986.2005.00293.x.

引用本文的文献

1
Neuropsychobiology of fear-induced bradycardia in humans: progress and pitfalls.人类恐惧诱发心动过缓的神经心理生物学:进展与困境
Mol Psychiatry. 2024 Dec;29(12):3826-3840. doi: 10.1038/s41380-024-02600-x. Epub 2024 Jun 11.
2
Behavioral and Physiological Reactions to a Sudden Novel Object in the Weanling Horse: Quantitative Phenotypes for Future GWAS.断乳期小马驹对突然出现的新奇物体的行为和生理反应:未来全基因组关联研究的定量表型。
Genes (Basel). 2023 Feb 26;14(3):593. doi: 10.3390/genes14030593.
3
The startle reflex in echolocating odontocetes: basic physiology and practical implications.
回声定位齿鲸的惊跳反射:基础生理学及实际意义。
J Exp Biol. 2020 Mar 12;223(Pt 5):jeb208470. doi: 10.1242/jeb.208470.
4
Effect of mother's voice on neonatal respiratory activity and EEG delta amplitude.母亲声音对新生儿呼吸活动及脑电图δ波幅的影响。
Dev Psychobiol. 2018 Mar;60(2):140-149. doi: 10.1002/dev.21596. Epub 2017 Dec 4.
5
The emotional and attentional impact of exposure to one's own body in bulimia nervosa: a physiological view.神经性贪食症中暴露于自身身体的情感和注意力影响:一种生理学观点。
PLoS One. 2014 Jul 18;9(7):e102595. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0102595. eCollection 2014.
6
Does physiologic response to loud tones change following cognitive-behavioral treatment for posttraumatic stress disorder?大声响的生理反应在创伤后应激障碍的认知行为治疗后是否会改变?
J Trauma Stress. 2012 Feb;25(1):25-32. doi: 10.1002/jts.21667.
7
Defensive engagement and perceptual enhancement.防御性互动和感知增强。
Neuropsychologia. 2010 Oct;48(12):3580-4. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2010.08.007. Epub 2010 Aug 14.
8
Cardiovascular responses to railway noise during sleep in young and middle-aged adults.睡眠中年轻和中年成年人对铁路噪声的心血管反应。
Eur J Appl Physiol. 2010 Mar;108(4):671-80. doi: 10.1007/s00421-009-1270-8. Epub 2009 Nov 10.
9
Communalities and differences in fear potentiation between cardiac defense and eyeblink startle.心防性和眼跳惊跳的恐惧增强之间的共性和差异。
Psychophysiology. 2009 Nov;46(6):1137-40. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8986.2009.00861.x. Epub 2009 Jul 1.