Gollub Marc J, Yoon Sora, Smith Lachlan McG, Moskowitz Chaya S
Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10023, and Department of Radiology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2006 Jan-Feb;30(1):25-32. doi: 10.1097/01.rct.0000191680.28344.f0.
The objective of this study was to determine the sensitivity of the CT "whirl sign" for the diagnosis of small bowel volvulus in patients who present with a clinical suspicion of intestinal obstruction. Between January 2002 and September 2004, 1,493 CT scans performed in 1,213 patients suspected of having small bowel obstruction were retrospectively reviewed by one attending radiologist with gastrointestinal subspecialization and one senior radiology resident. Multislice helical CT scans were performed after oral and intravenous contrast administration. All CT scans showing a combined vessel and bowel whirl appearance were identified. Other features recorded included the number of degrees of whirl rotation, direction of rotation, presence of bowel obstruction, and signs of ischemia. Diagnoses were determined at either surgery or clinicoradiographic follow-up. Surgical follow-up was available in 174 of the 1,213 patients. There were 460 males and 753 females ranging in age from 1 to 95 years (mean 59 years). A whirl sign was found in 33 of the 1,493 CT scans by reader 1 and in 13 of the 1,493 CT scans by reader 2. In 11 patients, surgery revealed small bowel volvulus (0.9%). Reader 1 detected 7 of the 11 volvuli (sensitivity 64%, specificity 98%, positive predictive value 21%, negative predictive value 99.7%). Reader 2 detected 3 of the 11 volvuli (sensitivity 27%, specificity 99%, positive predictive value 23%, negative predictive value 99.5%). The CT scans of the four remaining patients with volvulus not initially recognized by either reader were re-reviewed and were felt to contain whirl signs. Most patients with small bowel volvulus can be identified on CT through detection of a whirl sign. However, most whirl signs detected on CT will not prove to be indicative of small bowel volvulus.
本研究的目的是确定CT“漩涡征”对临床怀疑肠梗阻患者小肠扭转诊断的敏感性。在2002年1月至2004年9月期间,由一位具有胃肠亚专业的主治放射科医生和一位放射科高级住院医师对1213例疑似小肠梗阻患者进行的1493次CT扫描进行回顾性分析。在口服和静脉注射造影剂后进行多层螺旋CT扫描。识别出所有显示血管和肠管漩涡样表现的CT扫描。记录的其他特征包括漩涡旋转的度数、旋转方向、肠梗阻的存在以及缺血迹象。诊断通过手术或临床影像学随访确定。1213例患者中有174例接受了手术随访。共有460例男性和753例女性,年龄从1岁至95岁(平均59岁)。读者1在1493次CT扫描中发现33例有漩涡征,读者2在1493次CT扫描中发现13例有漩涡征。11例患者手术证实为小肠扭转(0.9%)。读者1检测出11例扭转中的7例(敏感性64%,特异性98%,阳性预测值21%,阴性预测值99.7%)。读者2检测出11例扭转中的3例(敏感性27%,特异性99%,阳性预测值23%,阴性预测值99.5%)。对最初两位读者均未识别出的其余4例扭转患者的CT扫描进行重新评估,认为其中包含漩涡征。大多数小肠扭转患者可通过检测CT上的漩涡征得以识别。然而,CT上检测到的大多数漩涡征并非小肠扭转的指征。