Witting Nanna, Kupers Ron C, Svensson Peter, Jensen Troels S
Department of Neurology and Danish Pain Research Center, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark CFIN, Aarhus University and Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark PET unit and Department of Surgical Pathophysiology, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark Department of Oral Maxillofacial Surgery, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark Department of Clinical Oral Physiology, Royal Dental College, Aarhus, Denmark.
Pain. 2006 Jan;120(1-2):145-154. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2005.10.034. Epub 2005 Dec 20.
Acute experimental brush-evoked allodynia induces a cortical activation pattern that differs from that typically seen during experimental nociceptive pain. In this study, we used positron emission tomography to measure changes in regional cerebral blood flow (rCBF) in patients with clinical allodynia. Nine patients with peripheral nerve injury were scanned during rest, brush-evoked allodynia, and brushing of normal contralateral skin. PET data were analyzed for the whole group and for single subjects. Allodynic stimulation activated the contralateral orbitofrontal cortex (BA 11) in every patient. Whereas normal brushing activated most strongly the contralateral insular cortex, allodynic brushing produced an ipsilateral activation in this area. Another important difference between normal and allodynic brushing was the absence of a contralateral primary somatosensory cortex (SI) activation during allodynic brushing. No thalamic activation was observed during allodynic or control brushing. Although no anterior cingulate cortex (ACC) activation could be demonstrated in the group analysis, single subject analysis revealed that four patients activated this region during brush-evoked allodynia. A direct post hoc comparison of brush -and allodynia-induced rCBF changes showed that allodynia was associated with significantly stronger activations in orbitofrontal cortex and ipsilateral insula whereas non-painful brushing more strongly activated SI and BA 5/7. These findings indicate that activity in the cortical network involved in the sensory-discriminative processing of nociceptive pain is downregulated in neuropathic pain. Instead, there is an upregulation of activity in the orbitofrontal and insular cortices, which is probably due to the stronger emotional load of neuropathic pain and higher computational demands of processing a mixed sensation of brush and pain.
急性实验性刷擦诱发的痛觉过敏所诱导的皮质激活模式,与实验性伤害性疼痛期间通常所见的模式不同。在本研究中,我们使用正电子发射断层扫描来测量临床痛觉过敏患者的局部脑血流量(rCBF)变化。对9名周围神经损伤患者在静息状态、刷擦诱发痛觉过敏以及对侧正常皮肤刷擦时进行扫描。对全组和单个受试者的PET数据进行分析。痛觉过敏刺激在每名患者中均激活了对侧眶额皮质(BA 11)。正常刷擦时最强激活的是对侧岛叶皮质,而痛觉过敏刷擦在此区域产生同侧激活。正常刷擦与痛觉过敏刷擦之间的另一个重要差异是,痛觉过敏刷擦期间对侧初级体感皮质(SI)无激活。在痛觉过敏或对照刷擦期间未观察到丘脑激活。虽然在组分析中未显示前扣带回皮质(ACC)激活,但单个受试者分析显示,4名患者在刷擦诱发痛觉过敏期间激活了该区域。对刷擦和痛觉过敏诱发的rCBF变化进行直接的事后比较表明,痛觉过敏与眶额皮质和同侧岛叶中明显更强的激活相关,而非痛性刷擦更强激活SI和BA 5/7。这些发现表明,在神经性疼痛中,参与伤害性疼痛感觉辨别处理的皮质网络活动下调。相反,眶额皮质和岛叶皮质的活动上调,这可能是由于神经性疼痛更强的情感负荷以及处理刷擦和疼痛混合感觉的更高计算需求所致。