Suppr超能文献

论辩性的概念化与测量

A conceptualization and measure of argumentativeness.

作者信息

Infante D A, Rancer A S

机构信息

Kent State University, School of Speech, Ohio 44242, USA.

出版信息

J Pers Assess. 1982 Feb;46(1):72-80. doi: 10.1207/s15327752jpa4601_13.

Abstract

A conceptualization and measure of argumentativeness is reported. Argumentativeness was conceptualized as a trait Which is composed of the tendency to approach arguments and the tendency to avoid arguments. A 20-item, self-report scale was developed in a series of three factor analytic studies. The internal consistency and test-retest reliabilities of the scale were high. A series of additional studies yielded considerable evidence as to the validity of the scale. The conceptualization of argumentativeness accounts for state as well as trait components. The state components consisted of the individual's perceptions of the probability and importance of success and failure in a particular argumentative situation. A hypothesis was supported which posited response to a particular argument would be predicted better by trait and state components together than by the trait component alone.

摘要

本文报告了一种关于好辩性的概念化及其测量方法。好辩性被概念化为一种特质,它由参与争论的倾向和避免争论的倾向组成。在一系列三项因素分析研究中,开发了一个包含20个条目的自陈量表。该量表的内部一致性和重测信度都很高。一系列额外的研究为该量表的有效性提供了大量证据。好辩性的概念化涵盖了状态成分和特质成分。状态成分包括个体对特定辩论情境中成功和失败的可能性及重要性的认知。一个假设得到了支持,即相较于单独的特质成分,特质和状态成分共同作用能更好地预测对特定辩论的反应。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验