• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

意大利语版沟通风格量表简版(CSI-B/I)的心理测量特性及初步效度研究

Psychometric Properties and a Preliminary Validation Study of the Italian Brief Version of the Communication Styles Inventory (CSI-B/I).

作者信息

Diotaiuti Pierluigi, Valente Giuseppe, Mancone Stefania, Grambone Angela

机构信息

Department of Human Sciences, Society and Health, University of Cassino and Southern Lazio, Cassino, Italy.

出版信息

Front Psychol. 2020 Jun 22;11:1421. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01421. eCollection 2020.

DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01421
PMID:32655460
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7323508/
Abstract

UNLABELLED

People will typically develop a communication style that tends to be coherent with their own fundamental personality traits. The current debate on communication style acknowledges the construct of adaptive behavior as an appropriate area where to include both the strictly personal aspects and social learning and cultural assimilation, which translate into communicative style as a specific form of adaptation integrating the behavioral and personality perspectives. Due to the lack of instruments in the Italian psychometric scenario to assess communication styles, the present study included the translation and validation of the Italian short version of the (CSI-B/I).

METHODS

The CSI-B/I was administered to a sample of 1,044 participants, while the concurrent validity was tested through a second administration to 518 participants along with the MPP ().

RESULTS

Confirmatory factor analysis bore out a three-factor solution (including 18 items) with good indices of adaptation to data, e.g., χ2/df = 1.251, RMSEA = 0.027, RMSEA 90% CI = 0.008-0.040, GFI = 0.958, AGFI = 0.937, CFI = 0.983 and NFI = 0.922. The CSI-B/I allows to measure three main dimensions of the communication style: impression manipulativeness; emotionality; expressiveness. Internal consistency reliability and significant correlations with the MPP supported the concurrent validity of the tool.

CONCLUSION

By virtue of its good psychometric properties, CSI-B/I represents an important addition to the assessment in multiple contexts: companies, institutions, staff selection, individual and group profile analysis, coaching, psychotherapy, counseling, career guidance.

摘要

未标注

人们通常会形成一种与自身基本人格特质相一致的沟通风格。当前关于沟通风格的辩论承认适应性行为这一概念是一个合适的领域,其中既包括严格意义上的个人方面,也包括社会学习和文化同化,这些会转化为作为一种整合行为和人格视角的特定适应形式的沟通风格。由于意大利心理测量领域缺乏评估沟通风格的工具,本研究纳入了对意大利语简短版(CSI - B/I)的翻译和验证。

方法

对1044名参与者的样本进行了CSI - B/I测试,同时通过对518名参与者再次进行测试并与MPP()一起进行,来检验同时效度。

结果

验证性因素分析证实了一个三因素解决方案(包括18个项目),具有良好的数据适配指标,例如,χ2/df = 1.251,RMSEA = 0.027,RMSEA 90%置信区间 = 0.008 - 0.040,GFI = 0.958,AGFI = 0.937,CFI = 0.983,NFI = 0.922。CSI - B/I能够测量沟通风格的三个主要维度:印象操纵性;情绪性;表达性。内部一致性信度以及与MPP的显著相关性支持了该工具的同时效度。

结论

凭借其良好的心理测量特性,CSI - B/I在多种情境的评估中是一项重要补充:公司、机构、员工选拔、个人和团体概况分析、辅导、心理治疗、咨询、职业指导。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f012/7323508/0f5363a542c5/fpsyg-11-01421-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f012/7323508/0f5363a542c5/fpsyg-11-01421-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f012/7323508/0f5363a542c5/fpsyg-11-01421-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Psychometric Properties and a Preliminary Validation Study of the Italian Brief Version of the Communication Styles Inventory (CSI-B/I).意大利语版沟通风格量表简版(CSI-B/I)的心理测量特性及初步效度研究
Front Psychol. 2020 Jun 22;11:1421. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01421. eCollection 2020.
2
Development and Preliminary Italian Validation of the Emergency Response and Psychological Adjustment Scale.《应急反应与心理调适量表》的编制及意大利语初步验证
Front Psychol. 2021 Aug 5;12:687514. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.687514. eCollection 2021.
3
[French validation of the Verona Service Satisfaction Scale-VSSS-54F].[《维罗纳服务满意度量表 - VSSS - 54F》的法语验证]
Encephale. 2003 Mar-Apr;29(2):110-8.
4
Communication Styles Inventory-Brief: Adaptation and validation for Spanish nursing.沟通风格量表-简明版:西班牙语护理的适应和验证。
Int J Health Plann Manage. 2021 Sep;36(5):1486-1499. doi: 10.1002/hpm.3188. Epub 2021 May 3.
5
[Multidimensional assessment of coping: validation of the Brief COPE among French population].应对方式的多维评估:法国人群中简易应对方式问卷(Brief COPE)的效度验证
Encephale. 2003 Nov-Dec;29(6):507-18.
6
Non-technical attributes and surgical experience: A cross-sectional study comparing communication styles and attitudes in surgical staff, trainees and applicants.非技术属性和手术经验:一项比较外科医护人员、学员和申请人沟通风格和态度的横断面研究。
Int J Surg. 2019 Mar;63:83-89. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2019.02.002. Epub 2019 Feb 12.
7
Decisional Balance Inventory (DBI) Adolescent Form for Smoking: Psychometric Properties of the Persian Version.吸烟决策平衡量表青少年版(DBI):波斯语版本的心理测量特性
BMC Public Health. 2017 May 25;17(1):507. doi: 10.1186/s12889-017-4425-2.
8
Validation study of the Italian version of Temporal Focus Scale: psychometric properties and convergent validity.《时间焦点量表意大利语版的验证研究:心理测量学特性和聚合效度》。
BMC Psychol. 2021 Feb 1;9(1):19. doi: 10.1186/s40359-020-00510-5.
9
Validation and Normalization of Grasha-Riechmann Teaching Style Inventory in Faculty Members of Zahedan University of Medical Sciences.设拉子医科大学教职员工中格拉沙-里希曼教学风格量表的验证与标准化
Adv Med Educ Pract. 2020 Apr 22;11:305-312. doi: 10.2147/AMEP.S244313. eCollection 2020.
10
The Polish Version of the Resilience Scale 25: Adaptation and Preliminary Psychometric Evaluation.波兰版复原力量表25:改编与初步心理测量学评估。
Front Psychol. 2021 May 14;12:668800. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.668800. eCollection 2021.

引用本文的文献

1
The Effect of Automated Verbal Commands During Avalanche Transceiver Search on Acute Mental Stress and Arousal-A Mixed-Methods Crossover Field Study.雪崩信标搜索期间自动语音指令对急性精神压力和唤醒的影响——一项混合方法交叉现场研究
Brain Behav. 2025 Jul;15(7):e70684. doi: 10.1002/brb3.70684.
2
Always in (partner) action? Working in teams may improve simulated flight performance-but only in the apt cognitive control state.总是处于(伙伴)行动中?团队合作可能会提高模拟飞行表现——但前提是处于恰当的认知控制状态。
Cogn Res Princ Implic. 2025 Jun 2;10(1):26. doi: 10.1186/s41235-025-00633-6.
3
Initial development of the Stress Monitoring and Response Tool (SMART): A holistic measure of stress following trauma.

本文引用的文献

1
The impact of communication style on patient satisfaction.沟通方式对患者满意度的影响。
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2019 Jul;176(2):349-356. doi: 10.1007/s10549-019-05232-w. Epub 2019 Apr 25.
2
The effects of training group exercise class instructors to adopt a motivationally adaptive communication style.培训团体运动课程教练以采用动机适应性沟通方式的效果。
Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2017 Sep;27(9):1026-1034. doi: 10.1111/sms.12713. Epub 2016 Jun 10.
3
A Comprehensive Trial Of The Scree And Kg Criteria For Determining The Number Of Factors.
应激监测与反应工具(SMART)的初步开发:创伤后应激的整体测量方法。
PLoS One. 2025 Jun 2;20(6):e0321939. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0321939. eCollection 2025.
4
Teaching Communication and Functional Life Skills in Children Diagnosed with Autism Spectrum Disorder.对被诊断为自闭症谱系障碍的儿童进行沟通和功能性生活技能教学。
Behav Sci (Basel). 2025 Feb 12;15(2):198. doi: 10.3390/bs15020198.
5
Validation of the Italian version of the intuitive exercise scale: a four-factor structure in the general population.意大利版直观运动量表的验证:一般人群中的四因素结构。
Eat Weight Disord. 2025 Feb 3;30(1):12. doi: 10.1007/s40519-025-01718-3.
6
Empirical Insights into Eye-Tracking for Design Evaluation: Applications in Visual Communication and New Media Design.设计评估中眼动追踪的实证洞察:在视觉传达与新媒体设计中的应用
Behav Sci (Basel). 2024 Dec 21;14(12):1231. doi: 10.3390/bs14121231.
7
Analysing Digital Engagement Patterns: A Machine Learning Investigation into Social Anxiety Among Adolescents with ADHD.分析数字参与模式:对多动症青少年社交焦虑的机器学习调查
J Clin Med. 2024 Dec 7;13(23):7461. doi: 10.3390/jcm13237461.
8
Integrating digital and interactive approaches in adolescent health literacy: a comprehensive review.将数字和互动方法融入青少年健康素养中:全面综述。
Front Public Health. 2024 Oct 9;12:1387874. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1387874. eCollection 2024.
9
Correlation between medical coping style and mindfulness level of hospitalized elderly: implications for enhancing psychological well-being.住院老年人的医学应对方式与正念水平的相关性:对增强心理健康的启示。
BMC Geriatr. 2024 Oct 12;24(1):823. doi: 10.1186/s12877-024-05437-9.
10
Enhancing nutritional knowledge and self-regulation among adolescents: efficacy of a multifaceted food literacy intervention.提高青少年的营养知识和自我管理能力:多方面食物素养干预措施的效果
Front Psychol. 2024 Sep 13;15:1405414. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1405414. eCollection 2024.
一项关于用于确定因子数量的斯克里特检验和凯泽标准的综合试验。
Multivariate Behav Res. 1977 Jul 1;12(3):289-325. doi: 10.1207/s15327906mbr1203_2.
4
Psychometric and Geometric Characteristics of the Revised Interpersonal Adjective Scales (IAS-R).修订版人际形容词量表(IAS-R)的心理测量学和几何学特征。
Multivariate Behav Res. 1988 Oct 1;23(4):517-30. doi: 10.1207/s15327906mbr2304_8.
5
A conceptualization and measure of argumentativeness.论辩性的概念化与测量
J Pers Assess. 1982 Feb;46(1):72-80. doi: 10.1207/s15327752jpa4601_13.
6
A six-factor structure of personality-descriptive adjectives: solutions from psycholexical studies in seven languages.人格描述形容词的六因素结构:来自七种语言心理词汇学研究的解决方案
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2004 Feb;86(2):356-66. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.86.2.356.
7
Nature over nurture: temperament, personality, and life span development.先天优于后天培养:气质、性格与毕生发展
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2000 Jan;78(1):173-86. doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.78.1.173.
8
Doctor-patient communication: a review of the literature.医患沟通:文献综述
Soc Sci Med. 1995 Apr;40(7):903-18. doi: 10.1016/0277-9536(94)00155-m.
9
An introduction to the five-factor model and its applications.五因素模型及其应用简介。
J Pers. 1992 Jun;60(2):175-215. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6494.1992.tb00970.x.