Novy D M, Blumentritt T L, Nelson D V, Gaa A
Department of Anesthesiology, University of Texas-Houston Health Science Center, 77030, USA.
J Pers Assess. 1997 Jun;68(3):616-27. doi: 10.1207/s15327752jpa6803_9.
Evidence from 85 adult medical outpatients supported psychometric comparability of the 2 halves of the Washington University Sentence Completion Test (SCT) Form 81 and of the female and male forms of the SCT. There was slightly stronger internal consistency for the first versus the second half of the SCT. Each half correlated highly with the ogive total protocol rating and 36-item-sum rating. Intercorrelations of the 2 halves with external measures also suggested essentially equivalent relations. For the 30 identical items across gender, the median correlation between individual item ratings with the item-sum ratings was nearly equal for women and men. When the 6 nonidentical items were considered with the identical items, the median item-total correlation was slightly higher for men (45) than women (41). This difference was accounted for by the slightly larger variability in the mate subsample. Practically speaking, the 2 halves and the female and male forms may be used with minimal concern regarding psychometric comparability in similar medical outpatient settings.
来自85名成年内科门诊患者的证据支持了华盛顿大学句子完成测试（SCT）81版两个部分以及SCT男女版本在心理测量学上的可比性。SCT前半部分的内部一致性略强于后半部分。每一半与累积总分评定和36项总和评定都高度相关。两部分与外部测量的相互关联也表明关系基本等同。对于30个跨性别的相同项目，女性和男性个体项目评分与项目总和评分之间的中位数相关性几乎相等。当将6个不同项目与相同项目一起考虑时，男性的中位数项目总分相关性（45）略高于女性（41）。这种差异是由男性子样本中略大的变异性造成的。实际上，在类似的内科门诊环境中，两个部分以及男女版本在心理测量学可比性方面可以放心使用，无需过多担忧。
