Suppr超能文献

利用术前磁共振成像预测肩袖撕裂模式及修复方法。

Use of preoperative magnetic resonance imaging to predict rotator cuff tear pattern and method of repair.

作者信息

Davidson J F James, Burkhart Stephen S, Richards David P, Campbell Scot E

机构信息

Canyon Orthopaedic Surgeons, Phoenix, Arizona, USA.

出版信息

Arthroscopy. 2005 Dec;21(12):1428. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2005.09.015.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To determine the magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) criteria for predicting rotator cuff tear pattern and method of repair.

TYPE OF STUDY

Retrospective MRI/arthroscopy correlation.

METHODS

Sixty-six preoperative MRI scans were evaluated. The maximum medial to lateral length (L) of the tear was measured on T2-weighted coronal cuts. The maximum anterior to posterior width (W) was measured on T2-weighted sagittal cuts. The cases were divided into 3 groups: group 1, short-wide tears, L < or = W, L < 2 cm; group 2, long-narrow tears, L > W, W < 2 cm; and group 3, long-wide tears, L > or = 2 cm, W > or = 2 cm.

RESULTS

Of the 66 MRI scans, 55 were adequate for standardized measurement. Group 1, 16 cases: 15 were found at arthroscopy to be crescent-shaped tears repaired end-to-bone; 1 was repaired with interval slides. Group 2, 22 cases: all 22 were repaired side-to-side/margin convergence. Group 3, 17 cases: 12 required interval slides, 1 partial repair was performed, and 4 were repaired side-to-side/margin convergence.

CONCLUSIONS

Tear pattern and method of repair can be predicted on high-quality MRI scan. Group 1, L < or = W and L < 2 cm, predicts a crescent-shaped tear and end-to-bone repair (positive predictive value, 93.8%). Group 2, L > W and W < 2 cm, predicts a longitudinal tear and side-to-side/margin convergence repair (positive predictive value 100%). Group 3, L > or = 2 cm and W > or = 2 cm, predicts a massive contracted tear and that primary end-to-bone or side-to-side repairs are usually not possible and that interval slides or partial repair may be necessary (positive predictive value, 76.5%). The overall diagnostic model based on usable MRI scans significantly predicted arthroscopic findings (P < .001 for chi-square test).

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, development of diagnostic criteria with universally applied reference (nonconsecutive patients).

摘要

目的

确定预测肩袖撕裂模式及修复方法的磁共振成像(MRI)标准。

研究类型

回顾性MRI/关节镜相关性研究。

方法

对66例术前MRI扫描进行评估。在T2加权冠状位图像上测量撕裂的最大内外侧长度(L)。在T2加权矢状位图像上测量撕裂的最大前后宽度(W)。病例分为3组:第1组,短而宽的撕裂,L≤W,L<2 cm;第2组,长而窄的撕裂,L>W,W<2 cm;第3组,长而宽的撕裂,L≥2 cm,W≥2 cm。

结果

66例MRI扫描中,55例适合进行标准化测量。第1组,16例:关节镜检查发现15例为新月形撕裂并采用骨对骨修复;1例采用间隔滑动修复。第2组,22例:所有22例均采用边对边/边缘对合修复。第3组,17例:12例需要间隔滑动修复,1例进行部分修复,4例采用边对边/边缘对合修复。

结论

高质量MRI扫描可预测撕裂模式及修复方法。第1组,L≤W且L<2 cm,提示新月形撕裂及骨对骨修复(阳性预测值,93.8%)。第2组,L>W且W<2 cm,提示纵向撕裂及边对边/边缘对合修复(阳性预测值100%)。第3组,L≥2 cm且W≥2 cm,提示巨大挛缩性撕裂,通常无法进行一期骨对骨或边对边修复,可能需要间隔滑动或部分修复(阳性预测值,76.5%)。基于可用MRI扫描的整体诊断模型能显著预测关节镜检查结果(卡方检验P<.001)。

证据水平

III级,采用普遍适用参考标准制定诊断标准(非连续患者)。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验