The San Antonio Orthopaedic Group, 150 E. Sonterra Blvd., San Antonio, TX 78258, U.S.A.
Arthroscopy. 2010 Nov;26(11):1427-33. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2010.02.028. Epub 2010 Sep 27.
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scan assessments of subscapularis tendon tears by comparing the preoperative MRI interpretations of radiologists with the actual results determined by arthroscopic evaluations of the same shoulders.
This retrospective review comprised all 120 patients who underwent primary arthroscopic rotator cuff repairs performed by the senior author during 2006. Of the 120 patients, 90 had high-field strength, conventional MRI scans performed within 190 days before their arthroscopic procedures.
All 16 patients with preoperative MRI scans that were interpreted by the radiologists as positive for subscapularis tendon tears were confirmed to be positive by arthroscopy, resulting in perfect specificity. However, the radiologists diagnosed only 16 of 44 subscapularis tears (36%) identified by arthroscopy. This resulted in an overall sensitivity of 36%, specificity of 100%, positive predictive value of 100%, negative predictive value of 62%, and accuracy of 69%.
Preoperative MRI scans of the shoulder do not reliably predict which rotator cuff injury patients have subscapularis tendon tears. Subscapularis tendon tears that extend at least half the cephalad-to-caudal distance are more easily detected by MRI scans, whereas smaller tears are usually missed on MRI scans.
Level III, development of diagnostic criteria with universally applied reference (nonconsecutive patients).
本研究旨在通过比较放射科医生术前 MRI 解读结果与同一肩部关节镜评估的实际结果,评估 MRI 扫描对肩胛下肌腱撕裂的诊断准确性。
本回顾性研究纳入了在 2006 年由高级作者进行的 120 例初次关节镜肩袖修复术的所有患者。在这 120 例患者中,有 90 例在关节镜手术前 190 天内进行了高磁场强度的常规 MRI 扫描。
所有术前 MRI 扫描被放射科医生解读为肩胛下肌腱撕裂阳性的 16 例患者均经关节镜检查证实为阳性,特异性为 100%。然而,放射科医生仅诊断出 44 例肩胛下肌腱撕裂(36%)中的 16 例。因此,敏感性为 36%,特异性为 100%,阳性预测值为 100%,阴性预测值为 62%,准确性为 69%。
肩部的术前 MRI 扫描不能可靠地预测哪些肩袖损伤患者有肩胛下肌腱撕裂。至少延伸至头侧到尾侧距离一半的肩胛下肌腱撕裂更容易通过 MRI 扫描检测到,而较小的撕裂通常在 MRI 扫描上漏诊。
III 级,具有普遍适用参考标准(非连续患者)的诊断标准的发展。