Pfeiffer P, Grube L
Department of Prosthetic Dentistry, School of Oral Medicine, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
Dent Mater. 2006 Dec;22(12):1093-7. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2005.09.003. Epub 2006 Jan 10.
This in vitro study evaluated the fracture load of interim FPDs made with various materials and pontic heights. The hypothesis was that different materials and pontic heights result in different fracture resistance.
Groups of interim FPDs were fabricated with prosthodontic resin materials on two abutments with two different pontic heights (4.3 and 5.8 mm) and a pontic width of 4 units (19 mm) (n = 3). The following materials were tested: (1) a thermoplastic polymer (Promysan Star), (2) Promysan Star with a veneering composite (Vita Zeta), (3) a non-impregnated polyethylene fiber reinforced resin (Ribbond) with a veneering composite (Sinfony), (4) an impregnated fiber reinforced composite system (Targis/Vectris), and (5) a conventional poly methyl methacrylate (PMMA) (Biodent K+B, control group). After 5000 thermocycles, the FPDs were temporarily fixed with a provisional cement on the corresponding abutments and tested for fracture strength. One-way and two-way ANOVA and Bonferroni-Dunn's multiple comparison tests were performed for the statistical analysis (alpha = 0.05).
The mean fracture strength ranged from 83.0 to 625.9 N for a pontic height of 4.3 mm and from 97.2 to 893.7 N for a pontic height of 5.8 mm. Vectris/Targis FPDs of both pontic heights exhibited significantly superior fracture resistance compared to the corresponding Promysan, Promysan/Vita Zeta, Ribbond/Sinfony and Biodent groups. Except Biodent FPDs, fracture resistance of FPDs with a pontic height of 4.3 mm showed no significant differences compared to a pontic height of 5.8 mm for each material.
Material type of the FPDs has a significant influence on the fracture strength, whereas pontic height has no significant effect (except control group).
本体外研究评估了采用不同材料和桥体高度制作的临时固定局部义齿的断裂载荷。假设是不同材料和桥体高度会导致不同的抗断裂性。
用修复树脂材料在两个基牙上制作临时固定局部义齿组,有两种不同的桥体高度(4.3和5.8毫米),桥体宽度为4单位(19毫米)(n = 3)。测试了以下材料:(1)一种热塑性聚合物(Promysan Star),(2)带有饰面复合材料的Promysan Star(Vita Zeta),(3)一种未浸渍的聚乙烯纤维增强树脂(Ribbond)与饰面复合材料(Sinfony),(4)一种浸渍纤维增强复合材料系统(Targis/Vectris),以及(5)一种传统的聚甲基丙烯酸甲酯(PMMA)(Biodent K+B,对照组)。经过5000次热循环后,将临时固定局部义齿用临时粘结剂临时固定在相应基牙上,并测试其断裂强度。进行单向和双向方差分析以及Bonferroni-Dunn多重比较检验进行统计分析(α = 0.05)。
对于4.3毫米的桥体高度,平均断裂强度范围为83.0至625.9牛,对于5.8毫米的桥体高度,平均断裂强度范围为97.2至893.7牛。两种桥体高度的Vectris/Targis临时固定局部义齿与相应的Promysan、Promysan/Vita Zeta、Ribbond/Sinfony和Biodent组相比,均表现出显著更高的抗断裂性。除了Biodent临时固定局部义齿外,对于每种材料,4.3毫米桥体高度的临时固定局部义齿的抗断裂性与5.8毫米桥体高度的相比无显著差异。
临时固定局部义齿的材料类型对断裂强度有显著影响,而桥体高度无显著影响(对照组除外)。