Clinic of Fixed and Removal Prosthodontics and Dental Material Science, Center of Dental Medicine, University of Zurich, Plattenstrasse 11, Zurich 8032, Switzerland.
Clin Oral Investig. 2012 Dec;16(6):1669-77. doi: 10.1007/s00784-011-0670-4. Epub 2012 Jan 3.
This study tested the fracture load of milled and conventionally fabricated polymeric and glass-ceramic three-unit fixed dental prostheses (FDPs) after aging.
FDPs were fabricated (N = 1,050) from four computer-aided design and computer-aided manufacturing (CAD/CAM) resins: (1) AT (artBlock Temp); (2) TC (Telio CAD); (3) ZP (ZENO PMMA); (4) CT (CAD-Temp); two conventionally fabricated resins, (5) IES (integral esthetic press), (6) CMK (CronMix K), and a glass-ceramic (control) (7) PG (IMAGINE PressX). Specimens of each group were tested immediately after fabrication (n = 15 per material). Seventy-five FDPs per material type were stored in artificial saliva (37°C) and 15 of them were randomly selected after aging (1, 7, 28, 90, and 180 days) for fracture load measurement. The remaining specimens (n = 60 per material) were subjected to chewing simulation (×120.000-1.200.000, 49 N, 5°C/50°C). The data were analyzed using two-way and one-way ANOVA followed by Scheffé test.
The interactions between FDP materials and aging time in both storage media showed a significant impact on the results (p < 0.001). Among saliva storage groups, TC and ZP showed the highest, and PG the lowest fracture load (p < 0.05). AT and CT were not affected from chewing simulation. TC, ZP, and AT presented the highest in ascending order (p < 0.05), PG and CMK showed the lowest fracture load after chewing simulation (p < 0.001).
Aging did not influence the fracture load of FDPs made of CAD/CAM resins. FDPs made of glass-ceramic showed significantly lower fracture load than those of all resin FDPs.
Considering fracture load measurements, CAD/CAM resins tested could be alternative materials to glass-ceramic for FDP construction.
本研究测试了老化后铣削和传统制作的聚合物和玻璃陶瓷三单位固定义齿(FDP)的断裂负荷。
从四种计算机辅助设计和计算机辅助制造(CAD/CAM)树脂中制作 FDP(N=1050):(1)AT(artBlock Temp);(2)TC(Telio CAD);(3)ZP(ZENO PMMA);(4)CT(CAD-Temp);两种传统制作的树脂,(5)IES(integral esthetic press),(6)CMK(CronMix K)和玻璃陶瓷(对照)(7)PG(IMAGINE PressX)。每组试件在制作后立即进行测试(每种材料 15 个试件)。每种材料类型的 75 个 FDP 在人工唾液(37°C)中储存,老化后随机选择其中 15 个(1、7、28、90 和 180 天)进行断裂负荷测量。其余试件(每种材料 60 个试件)进行咀嚼模拟(×120.000-1.200.000,49N,5°C/50°C)。使用双向和单向方差分析以及 Scheffé 检验对数据进行分析。
在两种储存介质中,FDP 材料与老化时间的相互作用对结果有显著影响(p<0.001)。在唾液储存组中,TC 和 ZP 显示出最高的断裂负荷,而 PG 显示出最低的断裂负荷(p<0.05)。AT 和 CT 不受咀嚼模拟的影响。TC、ZP 和 AT 依次显示出最高的断裂负荷(p<0.05),PG 和 CMK 显示出咀嚼模拟后最低的断裂负荷(p<0.001)。
老化不会影响 CAD/CAM 树脂制成的 FDP 的断裂负荷。玻璃陶瓷制成的 FDP 的断裂负荷明显低于所有树脂 FDP。
考虑到断裂负荷测量,测试的 CAD/CAM 树脂可以替代玻璃陶瓷用于 FDP 制作。