Heimendinger Jerianne, O'Neill Caitlin, Marcus Alfred C, Wolfe Pam, Julesburg Karen, Morra Marion, Allen Amy, Davis Sharon, Mowad Linda, Perocchia Rosemarie Slevin, Ward Joann Dewing, Strecher Victor, Warnecke Richard, Nowak Mike, Graf Ingrid, Fairclough Diane, Bryant Lucinda, Lipkus Isaac
AMC Cancer Research Center, Denver, Colorado 80829, USA.
J Health Commun. 2005;10 Suppl 1:65-82. doi: 10.1080/10810730500263646.
Results are reported from a large (n = 3,402) four-group randomized trial to increase fruit and vegetable consumption among callers to the National Cancer Institute's (NCI's) Cancer Information Service (CIS) using tailored print materials. Following a baseline telephone interview, which included a brief educational message (BEM), participants were assigned randomly within CIS offices to one of four groups: single untailored (SU) group-one untailored set of materials; single tailored (ST) group-one tailored booklet; multiple tailored (MT) group-four tailored materials; and multiple retailored (MRT) group-four tailored materials with retailoring based on new information obtained at 5 months follow-up. Follow-up telephone interviews were conducted at 5 (n = 2,233) and 12 months (n = 1,927) after baseline. The main outcome measure was self-reported fruit and vegetable consumption using a seven-item food frequency questionnaire. At 12 months follow-up, there was a significant linear trend across groups of 0.21 servings (p = 0.0002). Specific nested hypotheses then were tested and revealed significant mean serving differences between SU (5.07) vs. MT (5.64) (p = 0.002) and SU vs. MRT (5.71; p < 0.001). Although the mean for ST (5.40) was greater than that for SU (5.07), the difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.07), and no difference was found between MT vs. MRT (p = 0.69). A higher proportion of recipients of tailored materials reported reading all of the materials and believing that they were written especially for them. No differences by experimental condition were found for the perceived usefulness or motivational impact of the print materials. In this trial, MT print materials were more effective at increasing fruit and vegetable (FV) consumption than were SU materials. The intervention mechanisms responsible for this effect merit further research. Retailoring did not produce a significant difference when compared with longitudinal baseline tailoring.
报告了一项大型(n = 3402)四组随机试验的结果,该试验旨在通过使用量身定制的印刷材料,增加拨打美国国立癌症研究所(NCI)癌症信息服务(CIS)热线的人群的水果和蔬菜摄入量。在进行包括简短教育信息(BEM)的基线电话访谈后,参与者在CIS办公室内被随机分配到四组之一:单一非量身定制(SU)组——一套非量身定制的材料;单一量身定制(ST)组——一本量身定制的小册子;多重量身定制(MT)组——四份量身定制的材料;以及多重重新量身定制(MRT)组——四份根据5个月随访获得的新信息进行重新量身定制的材料。在基线后的5个月(n = 2233)和12个月(n = 1927)进行了随访电话访谈。主要结局指标是使用一份包含七个条目的食物频率问卷自我报告的水果和蔬菜摄入量。在12个月的随访中,各组之间存在显著的线性趋势,相差0.21份(p = 0.0002)。随后对特定的嵌套假设进行了检验,结果显示SU组(5.07)与MT组(5.64)之间存在显著的平均份数差异(p = 0.002),SU组与MRT组(5.71;p < 0.001)之间也存在显著差异。虽然ST组的平均值(5.40)高于SU组(5.07),但差异无统计学意义(p = 0.07),且MT组与MRT组之间未发现差异(p = 0.69)。更高比例的量身定制材料接收者报告阅读了所有材料,并认为这些材料是专门为他们编写的。在印刷材料的感知有用性或激励影响方面,未发现实验条件之间存在差异。在该试验中,MT印刷材料在增加水果和蔬菜(FV)摄入量方面比SU材料更有效。造成这种效果的干预机制值得进一步研究。与纵向基线量身定制相比,重新量身定制未产生显著差异。