• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

左主干冠状动脉疾病:冠状动脉旁路移植术仍是金标准吗?

Left main coronary artery disease: is CABG still the gold standard?

作者信息

Ng Martin K C, Yeung Alan C

机构信息

Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford, California, USA.

出版信息

Rev Cardiovasc Med. 2005 Fall;6(4):187-93.

PMID:16379014
Abstract

Severe stenosis of the left main coronary artery (LMCA) is a coronary artery-disease manifestation of critical prognostic importance. As a consequence of the survival advantage conferred by coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) over medical therapy, lesions in the LMCA have been considered a standard indication for CABG for nearly 3 decades. Initial attempts to treat LMCA disease percutaneously by balloon angioplasty resulted in poor clinical outcomes, leading many to regard significant LMCA disease as a contraindication for percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). However, the development and refinement of coronary stenting over the last 15 years, followed by the recent introduction of drug-eluting stents, has fueled renewed interest in percutaneous treatment of LMCA disease. Outcomes of recent studies using sirolimus- and/or paclitaxel-eluting stents for treatment of LMCA disease have yielded rates of in-hospital and 1-year mortality that compare favorably with those of surgery. This article will review the natural history of LMCA disease, the outcomes of CABG for LMCA disease, and the history and recent developments regarding PCI for LMCA disease.

摘要

左冠状动脉主干(LMCA)严重狭窄是一种具有关键预后重要性的冠状动脉疾病表现。由于冠状动脉旁路移植术(CABG)相对于药物治疗具有生存优势,近30年来,LMCA病变一直被视为CABG的标准适应证。最初尝试通过球囊血管成形术经皮治疗LMCA疾病导致了较差的临床结果,使得许多人将严重的LMCA疾病视为经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)的禁忌证。然而,在过去15年中冠状动脉支架的发展与完善,以及近期药物洗脱支架的引入,重新激发了人们对经皮治疗LMCA疾病的兴趣。最近使用西罗莫司和/或紫杉醇洗脱支架治疗LMCA疾病的研究结果显示,住院死亡率和1年死亡率与手术相当。本文将综述LMCA疾病的自然病程、CABG治疗LMCA疾病的结果以及LMCA疾病PCI的历史和近期进展。

相似文献

1
Left main coronary artery disease: is CABG still the gold standard?左主干冠状动脉疾病:冠状动脉旁路移植术仍是金标准吗?
Rev Cardiovasc Med. 2005 Fall;6(4):187-93.
2
Percutaneous coronary intervention for unprotected left main coronary artery stenosis.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗无保护左主干冠状动脉狭窄。
Cardiol Clin. 2010 Feb;28(1):81-95. doi: 10.1016/j.ccl.2009.09.001.
3
Long-term clinical outcomes of sirolimus- versus paclitaxel-eluting stents for patients with unprotected left main coronary artery disease: analysis of the MAIN-COMPARE (revascularization for unprotected left main coronary artery stenosis: comparison of percutaneous coronary angioplasty versus surgical revascularization) registry.西罗莫司洗脱支架与紫杉醇洗脱支架治疗无保护左主干冠状动脉疾病患者的长期临床结局:MAIN-COMPARE(无保护左主干冠状动脉狭窄血运重建:经皮冠状动脉腔内血管成形术与外科血运重建比较)注册研究分析
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2009 Aug 25;54(9):853-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2009.04.071.
4
Treatment of unprotected left main coronary artery stenosis in the drug-eluting stent era.药物洗脱支架时代非保护左主干冠状动脉狭窄的治疗
J Interv Cardiol. 2005 Dec;18(6):455-65. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8183.2005.00086.x.
5
Percutaneous coronary intervention with stent implantation versus coronary artery bypass surgery for treatment of left main coronary artery disease: is it time to change guidelines?经皮冠状动脉介入治疗联合支架植入术与冠状动脉旁路移植术治疗左主干冠状动脉疾病:是否是时候改变指南了?
Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2009 Feb;2(1):59-68. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.108.831701.
6
Coronary angioplasty in drug eluting stent era for the treatment of unprotected left main stenosis compared to coronary artery bypass grafting.药物洗脱支架时代冠状动脉血管成形术与冠状动脉旁路移植术治疗无保护左主干狭窄的比较
Ann Med. 2008;40(6):437-43. doi: 10.1080/07853890701879790.
7
Patients enrolled in coronary intervention trials are not representative of patients in clinical practice: results from the Euro Heart Survey on Coronary Revascularization.参加冠状动脉介入试验的患者不能代表临床实践中的患者:欧洲冠状动脉血运重建调查结果
Eur Heart J. 2006 Mar;27(6):671-8. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehi731. Epub 2006 Jan 19.
8
Outcomes of coronary artery bypass grafting versus percutaneous coronary intervention with drug-eluting stents for patients with multivessel coronary artery disease.多支冠状动脉疾病患者冠状动脉搭桥术与药物洗脱支架经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的疗效比较
Circulation. 2007 Sep 11;116(11 Suppl):I200-6. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.106.681148.
9
The SYNergy between percutaneous coronary intervention with TAXus and cardiac surgery (SYNTAX) study: design, rationale, and run-in phase.紫杉醇药物洗脱支架冠状动脉介入治疗与心脏手术协同作用(SYNTAX)研究:设计、原理及导入阶段
Am Heart J. 2006 Jun;151(6):1194-204. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2005.07.017.
10
Long-term safety and efficacy of percutaneous coronary intervention with stenting and coronary artery bypass surgery for multivessel coronary artery disease: a meta-analysis with 5-year patient-level data from the ARTS, ERACI-II, MASS-II, and SoS trials.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗联合支架置入术与冠状动脉旁路移植术治疗多支冠状动脉疾病的长期安全性和疗效:一项基于ARTS、ERACI-II、MASS-II和SoS试验5年患者水平数据的荟萃分析。
Circulation. 2008 Sep 9;118(11):1146-54. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.107.752147. Epub 2008 Aug 25.