de Andrade A L, Martelli C M, Luquetti A O, de Oliveira O S, Almeida e Silva S, Zicker F
Universidade Federal de Goiás, Instituto de Patologia Tropical e Saúde Pública, Brasil.
Bull Pan Am Health Organ. 1992;26(2):157-64.
The study reported here compares results obtained by blood banks screening sera for chagasic (Trypanosoma cruzi) infection with results obtained by the Chagas' Disease Reference Laboratory of the Federal University of Goiás in Goiânia, Brazil. It also evaluates results obtained using the ELISA technique to screen the study sera. The survey used data from six of eight blood banks serving the city of Goiânia, an urban region of Central Brazil where Chagas' disease is highly endemic. The survey population consisted of 1,513 voluntary first-time blood donors whose donations occurred between October 1988 and April 1989. This group included 50% of all the first-time blood donors in that period. The six participating blood banks, which accounted for about 90% of all blood donations in Goiânia during the study period, routinely used indirect hemagglutination (IHA) and complement fixation (CF) tests to screen sera for antibodies to T. cruzi. Comparison of the results provided by the blood banks with the reference laboratory's results indicated a relative sensitivity of 77%, which ranged from 50% to 100% depending on the blood bank studied. The comparison, which found 12 false negative results, indicated that transfusions of infected blood might have occurred despite the serologic screening performed by the blood banks. Relative to the standard of positivity established for the study, the enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) technique was found to have a sensitivity of 96.3%. Considering as positive only those sera yielding positive IHA and indirect immunofluorescence (IIF) test results, the ELISA technique yielded 2 false negative and 41 false positive responses.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
本文报道的研究比较了血库筛查血清锥虫病(克氏锥虫感染)的结果与巴西戈亚尼亚戈亚斯联邦大学恰加斯病参考实验室的检测结果。该研究还评估了使用酶联免疫吸附测定(ELISA)技术筛查研究血清所获结果。此次调查采用了为戈亚尼亚市供血的八家血库中六家的数据,戈亚尼亚市是巴西中部的一个城市地区,恰加斯病高度流行。调查对象包括1513名首次自愿献血者,他们的献血时间在1988年10月至1989年4月之间。这一群体占该时期所有首次献血者的50%。在研究期间,这六家参与调查的血库约占戈亚尼亚所有献血量的90%,它们常规使用间接血凝试验(IHA)和补体结合试验(CF)来筛查血清中的克氏锥虫抗体。血库提供的结果与参考实验室结果的比较表明,相对灵敏度为77%,根据所研究的血库不同,该灵敏度在50%至100%之间。此次比较发现了12例假阴性结果,这表明尽管血库进行了血清学筛查,但仍可能发生感染血液的输血情况。相对于为该研究确定的阳性标准,酶联免疫吸附测定(ELISA)技术的灵敏度为96.3%。仅将IHA和间接免疫荧光试验(IIF)结果呈阳性的血清视为阳性时,ELISA技术产生了2例假阴性和41例假阳性反应。(摘要截选至250词)