Suppr超能文献

在胸痛患者中,使用梅森-利卡尔肢体导联配置比较基于快速皮肤阻抗测量(EASI)得出的12导联心电图与护理人员采集的12导联心电图。

Comparison of EASI-derived 12-lead electrocardiograms versus paramedic-acquired 12-lead electrocardiograms using Mason-Likar limb lead configuration in patients with chest pain.

作者信息

Sejersten Maria, Pahlm Olle, Pettersson Jonas, Zhou Sophia, Maynard Charles, Feldman Charles L, Wagner Galen S

机构信息

Department of Cardiology, Duke Clinical Research Institute, Durham, NC 27705, USA.

出版信息

J Electrocardiol. 2006 Jan;39(1):13-21. doi: 10.1016/j.jelectrocard.2005.05.011. Epub 2005 Nov 9.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Monitoring or serial 12-lead electrocardiogram (ECG) recordings are the accepted requirement for prehospital data acquisition in patients with chest pain. The purpose of this study was to determine whether waveforms and clinical triage decision are similar in EASI-derived ECGs and paramedic-acquired 12-lead ECGs using Mason-Likar limb lead configuration when compared with standard 12-lead ECGs (stdECG).

METHOD

Twenty patients with chest pain had a prehospital 12-lead ECG recorded in the ambulance, and paramedic-applied electrodes retained in place at hospital arrival. An ECG technician applied standard precordial and EASI electrodes in their correct positions. Twelve-lead ECGs were obtained from the paramedic-applied electrodes, using their Mason-Likar limb lead configuration, and derived from the EASI leads for comparison with the stdECG. Three computer-measured QRS-T waveform parameters were considered, and differences in waveform measurement between EASI and stdECG (EASIDeltastdECG) versus differences in waveform measurements between paramedic Mason-Likar and stdECG (PMLDeltastdECG) were calculated. Two physicians determined whether the EASI-derived or the paramedic Mason-Likar ECG contained information that would change their clinical triage decision from that indicated by the stdECG.

RESULTS

EASIDeltastdECG and PMLDeltastdECG were identical in 28%, whereas EASIDeltastdECG was more than PMLDeltastdECG in 35%, and PMLDeltastdECG was accurate (both time) than EASIDeltastdECG in 37% (P = .62). The physicians were more likely to change the level of patient care based on the EASI-derived ECGs compared with the paramedic ECGs; however, this difference was not statistically significant (P = .27), but this may only be caused by the small study population.

CONCLUSIONS

There are similar differences from stdECG waveforms in EASI-derived ECGs and those acquired via paramedic-applied precordial electrodes using Mason-Likar limb lead configuration. Either method can be used as a substitute for monitoring, but neither should be considered equivalent to the stdECG for diagnostic purposes.

摘要

引言

对于胸痛患者,监测或连续12导联心电图(ECG)记录是院前数据采集的公认要求。本研究的目的是确定与标准12导联心电图(stdECG)相比,采用马森-利卡尔肢体导联配置时,源自EASI的心电图和护理人员采集的12导联心电图中的波形及临床分诊决策是否相似。

方法

20例胸痛患者在救护车上进行了院前12导联心电图记录,到达医院时护理人员所贴电极保持原位。一名心电图技术人员将标准胸导联和EASI电极正确放置。从护理人员所贴电极获取12导联心电图,采用其马森-利卡尔肢体导联配置,并从EASI导联导出,以与stdECG进行比较。考虑了三个计算机测量的QRS-T波形参数,并计算了EASI与stdECG之间的波形测量差异(EASIDeltastdECG)与护理人员马森-利卡尔导联与stdECG之间的波形测量差异(PMLDeltastdECG)。两名医生确定源自EASI的心电图或护理人员马森-利卡尔心电图是否包含会改变其临床分诊决策(与stdECG所示决策相比)的信息。

结果

EASIDeltastdECG和PMLDeltastdECG在28%的情况下相同,而EASIDeltastdECG在35% 的情况下大于PMLDeltastdECG,PMLDeltastdECG在37% 的情况下比EASIDeltastdECG更准确(两次均如此)(P = 0.62)。与护理人员的心电图相比,医生更有可能根据源自EASI的心电图改变患者护理级别;然而,这种差异无统计学意义(P = 0.27),但这可能仅由研究人群规模较小所致。

结论

源自EASI的心电图以及通过采用马森-利卡尔肢体导联配置的护理人员所贴胸导联电极获取的心电图与stdECG波形存在相似差异。两种方法均可用于替代监测,但出于诊断目的,两者均不应被视为等同于stdECG。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验