Feldman Charles L, Milstein Shoshana Z, Neubecker Diana, Underhill B Kevin, Moyer Eric, Glumm Steve, Womble Matthew, Auer Jan, Maynard Charles, Serra Richard K, Wagner Galen S
Cardiovascular Division, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Am J Cardiol. 2005 Aug 1;96(3):453-6. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2005.03.100.
This study compared the 5-electrode-derived EASI electrocardiogram (ECG) with the conventional Mason-Likar ECG in 200 consecutive patients with chest pain transported to 3 hospitals by 2 different emergency medical services. No significant differences were observed between the 2 systems for the detection of relevant electrocardiographic abnormalities. A questionnaire administered to participating emergency medical personnel revealed a high degree of acceptability of the EASI ECG, with some participants commenting that the sternal and mid-axillary locations of the EASI electrodes made them easier to apply, especially to women, than conventional precordial electrodes.
本研究将200例因胸痛由两家不同的紧急医疗服务机构转运至3家医院的患者,其通过5电极导出的EASI心电图(ECG)与传统的Mason-Likar心电图进行了比较。在检测相关心电图异常方面,两种系统之间未观察到显著差异。对参与研究的急救人员进行的问卷调查显示,EASI心电图具有高度可接受性,一些参与者评论称,与传统的心前区电极相比,EASI电极在胸骨和腋中线的位置使其更易于应用,尤其是对女性而言。