• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

住院医师同行评审。

Peer review for residents.

作者信息

Patel Malini, Hardy Daniel W, Chand Ravi

机构信息

The Chicago Medical School/Rosalind Franklin University of Medicine and Science, North Chicago, Illinois, USA.

出版信息

Acad Psychiatry. 2005 Nov-Dec;29(5):490-4. doi: 10.1176/appi.ap.29.5.490.

DOI:10.1176/appi.ap.29.5.490
PMID:16387976
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Accreditation Council of Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) currently requires experiences in administration for psychiatry residents. In response to this challenge, the authors created a peer review workshop.

METHODS

The authors report on the design, implementation, and outcome of the peer review workshop for PGY-3 and PGY-4 psychiatry residents.

RESULTS

Comparison of pre and post results of a 10-question test given to the resident group showed a statistically significant improvement. Moreover, it was noticed that the discussion among the residents rose to a new level of appreciation of administrative techniques and skills. The residents rated the workshop very favorably and unanimously recommended that the workshop be repeated on a yearly basis at the beginning of the academic year with the previous year's PGY-3s serving as mentors at each clinical site.

CONCLUSION

The workshop process described has potential practical application for other psychiatry residency programs that are also attempting to respond to these ACGME challenges.

摘要

目的

研究生医学教育认证委员会(ACGME)目前要求精神科住院医师具备管理方面的经验。为应对这一挑战,作者创建了一个同行评审研讨会。

方法

作者报告了针对三年级和四年级精神科住院医师的同行评审研讨会的设计、实施情况及结果。

结果

对住院医师组进行的一项10道题测试的前后结果比较显示,有统计学意义的提高。此外,还注意到住院医师之间的讨论上升到了对管理技术和技能的新认识水平。住院医师对该研讨会评价很高,并一致建议在学年开始时每年重复举办该研讨会,让上一年的三年级住院医师在每个临床地点担任导师。

结论

所描述的研讨会流程对于其他也在试图应对ACGME这些挑战的精神科住院医师培训项目具有潜在的实际应用价值。

相似文献

1
Peer review for residents.住院医师同行评审。
Acad Psychiatry. 2005 Nov-Dec;29(5):490-4. doi: 10.1176/appi.ap.29.5.490.
2
The feasibility and effectiveness of a pilot resident-organized and -led knowledge base review.试点住院医生组织和主导知识库审查的可行性和有效性。
Acad Psychiatry. 2010 Jul-Aug;34(4):258-62. doi: 10.1176/appi.ap.34.4.258.
3
Preparing for a successful psychiatry residency review committee site visit: a guide for new training directors.为精神科住院医师评审委员会的成功现场考察做准备:给新培训主任的指南。
Acad Psychiatry. 2005 Jul-Aug;29(3):249-55. doi: 10.1176/appi.ap.29.3.249.
4
New ACGME work-hour guidelines and their impact on current residency training practices.
Acad Psychiatry. 2005 Jul-Aug;29(3):279-82. doi: 10.1176/appi.ap.29.3.279.
5
A developmental model for enhancing research training during psychiatry residency.一种用于加强精神病学住院医师培训期间研究训练的发展模型。
Acad Psychiatry. 2006 Jan-Feb;30(1):55-62. doi: 10.1176/appi.ap.30.1.55.
6
Teaching forensic psychiatry to general psychiatry residents.向普通精神病学住院医师传授法医精神病学知识。
Acad Psychiatry. 2004 Spring;28(1):40-6. doi: 10.1176/appi.ap.28.1.40.
7
Characteristics of combined family practice-psychiatry residency programs.家庭医学与精神病学联合住院医师培训项目的特点。
Acad Psychiatry. 2005 Nov-Dec;29(5):419-25. doi: 10.1176/appi.ap.29.5.419.
8
Identifying areas for curricular program improvement based on perceptions of skills, competencies, and performance.基于对技能、能力和表现的认知来确定课程计划改进的领域。
Acad Psychiatry. 2009 Jan-Feb;33(1):37-42. doi: 10.1176/appi.ap.33.1.37.
9
Training psychiatric residents for Part II of the American Board of Psychiatry and Neurology Examination.为美国精神病学与神经病学委员会考试第二部分培训精神科住院医师。
Bull Menninger Clin. 1999 Winter;63(1):111-7.
10
Overcoming barriers in working with families.克服与家庭合作中的障碍。
Acad Psychiatry. 2006 Sep-Oct;30(5):379-84. doi: 10.1176/appi.ap.30.5.379.