Fabre N, Perrey S, Arbez L, Ruiz J, Tordi N, Rouillon J D
Laboratoire des Sciences du Sport, Besançon, France.
Int J Sports Med. 2006 Jan;27(1):67-74. doi: 10.1055/s-2005-837486.
This study aimed (i) to quantify the spontaneous coordination between breathing and hand rim wheelchair propulsion, (ii) to manipulate arm movement frequency and assess its effects on spontaneous coordination, and (iii) to investigate the hypothesis that entrainment of breathing improves economy of locomotion and leads to a lower rate of perceived exertion (RPE) compared with spontaneous breathing. Nine male, able-bodied participants completed four bouts of 6 min submaximal steady state exercise at 60 % of maximal propulsion velocity on a wheelchair ergometer, with spontaneous breathing and arm frequencies (Fspont), with 20 % higher and lower arm frequencies (F +20 and F -20, respectively) compared to Fspont accompanied with spontaneous breathing frequency, and by synchronising expiration phase with pushing time and inspiration phase with upper limb recovery time (C). Oxygen uptake and propulsion frequency were continuously recorded. The degree of coordination was expressed as a percentage of inspiration starting in the same phase of the wheelchair propulsion cycle (i.e. pushing and recovery times). No difference in degree of coordination was observed between Fspont, F -20 and F +20 conditions (49.2 +/- 12.1 %, 49.1 +/- 29.0 % and 48.2 +/- 29.4 %, respectively). Oxygen uptake increased significantly during C condition while RPE was significantly lower for C and F -20 (p < 0.05) compared to F +20 conditions. Contrary to what we expected, entrainment of breathing using a monofrequency ratio (C) induced a higher energy cost probably due to the mechanical properties of the wheelchair propulsion activity itself. In conclusion, this study showed that the same locomotor-respiratory coupling occurred during hand rim wheelchair propulsion regardless of the arm movement frequency, and that entrainment of breathing did not improve economy of locomotion.
(i)量化呼吸与手动轮椅推进之间的自发协调性;(ii)控制手臂运动频率并评估其对自发协调性的影响;(iii)研究如下假设:与自发呼吸相比,呼吸同步化可改善运动经济性并降低主观用力程度(RPE)。九名身体健全的男性参与者在轮椅测力计上以最大推进速度的60%完成了四组6分钟的次最大稳态运动,分别为自发呼吸和手臂频率(Fspont)、比Fspont高20%和低20%的手臂频率(分别为F +20和F -20)并伴有自发呼吸频率,以及将呼气阶段与推的时间同步、吸气阶段与上肢恢复时间同步(C)。持续记录摄氧量和推进频率。协调性程度以在轮椅推进周期同一阶段开始吸气的百分比来表示(即推和恢复时间)。在Fspont、F -20和F +20条件下,协调性程度未观察到差异(分别为49.2 +/- 12.1%、49.1 +/- 29.0%和48.2 +/- 29.4%)。在C条件下摄氧量显著增加,而与F +20条件相比,C和F -20条件下的RPE显著更低(p < 0.05)。与我们的预期相反,使用单频比(C)进行呼吸同步化可能由于轮椅推进活动本身的机械特性而导致更高的能量消耗。总之,本研究表明,无论手臂运动频率如何,在手动轮椅推进过程中都会出现相同的运动-呼吸耦合,并且呼吸同步化并未改善运动经济性。