Lenton J P, van der Woude L, Fowler N, Goosey-Tolfrey V
Department of Exercise & Sport Science, The Manchester Metropolitan University, Stoke-On-Trent, United Kingdom.
Int J Sports Med. 2009 Apr;30(4):233-9. doi: 10.1055/s-0028-1105949. Epub 2009 Feb 6.
To further understand the possible underlying mechanisms of the low efficiencies in hand rim wheelchair propulsion, this study examined efficiency indices at different arm frequencies during two propulsion modes (synchronous and asynchronous). Fourteen male able-bodied participants performed VO2PEAK tests for both propulsion modes. Subsequently two sub-maximal exercise tests examining synchronous and asynchronous propulsion were completed at an individualised velocity (60% of VO2PEAK). The freely chosen arm frequency (FCF), followed by four counter-balanced trials at 60, 80, 120, and 140% of FCF were performed. Gross, net, and work efficiency were determined. Gross efficiency was significantly lower (p<0.05) at arm frequencies >100%, and participants were more efficient between 60 to 100% FCF. These arm frequencies corresponded to 76+/-22 to 126+/-36 and 70+/-18 to 116+/-30 pushes x min(-1) (synchronous and asynchronous respectively). Trends in VO2, gross and work efficiency suggest that 80% of FCF produced the best economy and efficiency during both propulsion modes (non-significant). Gross and work efficiency at 80% FCF were 6.8+/-0.7% and 13.0+/-4.6% for synchronous and 7.0+/-0.8% and 11.5+/-1.6% for asynchronous respectively. The results suggest that during both modes of propulsion the FCF is not necessarily the most efficient.
为了进一步了解手动轮圈轮椅推进效率低下可能的潜在机制,本研究在两种推进模式(同步和异步)下,检测了不同手臂频率下的效率指标。14名身体健全的男性参与者针对两种推进模式进行了最大摄氧量(VO2PEAK)测试。随后,在个性化速度(最大摄氧量的60%)下完成了两项次最大运动测试,分别检测同步和异步推进情况。先进行自由选择的手臂频率(FCF)测试,然后在FCF的60%、80%、120%和140%下进行四项平衡试验。测定了总效率、净效率和功效率。当手臂频率>100%时,总效率显著降低(p<0.05),参与者在FCF的60%至100%之间效率更高。这些手臂频率分别对应于76±22至126±36次/分钟和70±18至116±30次/分钟的推次(分别为同步和异步)。摄氧量、总效率和功效率的趋势表明,在两种推进模式下,FCF的80%产生了最佳的经济性和效率(无显著差异)。同步推进时,FCF为80%时的总效率和功效率分别为6.8±0.7%和%13.0±4.6,异步推进时分别为7.0±0.8%和11.5±1.6%。结果表明,在两种推进模式下,FCF不一定是最有效的。