• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

脊髓刺激术对于严重肢体缺血的非手术治疗并不具有成本效益。

Spinal cord stimulation is not cost-effective for non-surgical management of critical limb ischaemia.

作者信息

Klomp H M, Steyerberg E W, van Urk H, Habbema J D F

机构信息

Department of Vascular Surgery, Erasmus University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2006 May;31(5):500-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2005.11.013. Epub 2006 Jan 4.

DOI:10.1016/j.ejvs.2005.11.013
PMID:16388973
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To quantify the costs of treatment in critical limb ischaemia (CLI) and to compare costs and effectiveness of two treatment strategies: spinal cord stimulation (SCS) and best medical treatment.

METHODS

One hundred and twenty patients with CLI not suitable for vascular reconstruction were randomised to either SCS in addition to best medical treatment or best medical treatment alone. Primary outcomes were mortality, amputation and cost. Cost analysis was based on resources used by patients for 2 years after randomisation. Both medical and non-medical costs were included.

RESULTS

Patient and limb survival were similar in the two treatment groups. Costs of in-hospital-stay and institutional rehabilitation constituted the predominant part (+/-70%) of the total costs of medical care in CLI. Cost of SCS-implantation and complications (7950 euro per patient) exceeded by far cost due to amputation procedures (410 euro per patient). The total costs of treatment were 36,600 euro per patient over 2 years for the SCS-group vs. 28,700 euro for best medical treatment alone (28% higher for SCS-group, p=0.009).

CONCLUSIONS

Total costs of treatment in CLI are high. Major components are hospital and rehabilitation costs. In contrast to recent reviews, there were no long-term benefits of SCS-treatment. Therefore, cost-effectiveness is reduced to cost-minimisation and SCS-treatment is considerably more expensive than best medical treatment.

摘要

目的

量化严重肢体缺血(CLI)的治疗成本,并比较两种治疗策略的成本和效果:脊髓刺激(SCS)和最佳药物治疗。

方法

120例不适合血管重建的CLI患者被随机分为两组,一组在最佳药物治疗基础上加用SCS,另一组仅接受最佳药物治疗。主要结局指标为死亡率、截肢率和成本。成本分析基于患者随机分组后2年所使用的资源。医疗和非医疗成本均包括在内。

结果

两个治疗组的患者和肢体存活率相似。住院和机构康复成本占CLI医疗总费用的主要部分(约70%)。SCS植入及并发症的成本(每位患者7950欧元)远远超过截肢手术的成本(每位患者410欧元)。SCS组2年的治疗总费用为每位患者36,600欧元,而仅接受最佳药物治疗组为28,700欧元(SCS组高28%,p = 0.009)。

结论

CLI的治疗总成本很高。主要组成部分是医院和康复成本。与近期综述不同,SCS治疗没有长期益处。因此,成本效益降低为成本最小化,且SCS治疗比最佳药物治疗昂贵得多。

相似文献

1
Spinal cord stimulation is not cost-effective for non-surgical management of critical limb ischaemia.脊髓刺激术对于严重肢体缺血的非手术治疗并不具有成本效益。
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2006 May;31(5):500-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2005.11.013. Epub 2006 Jan 4.
2
Quality of life, resource consumption and costs of spinal cord stimulation versus conventional medical management in neuropathic pain patients with failed back surgery syndrome (PROCESS trial).脊髓刺激与传统药物治疗对腰椎手术失败综合征神经性疼痛患者的生活质量、资源消耗及成本的影响(PROCESS试验)
Eur J Pain. 2008 Nov;12(8):1047-58. doi: 10.1016/j.ejpain.2008.01.014. Epub 2008 Mar 21.
3
Late outcome of spinal cord stimulation for unreconstructable and limb-threatening lower limb ischemia.脊髓刺激治疗不可重建且危及肢体的下肢缺血的远期疗效
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2007 Jun;33(6):717-24. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2006.12.012. Epub 2007 Feb 12.
4
Spinal cord stimulation in hemodialysis patients with critical lower-limb ischemia.脊髓刺激在患有严重下肢缺血的血液透析患者中的应用
Am J Kidney Dis. 2006 May;47(5):842-7. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2006.02.172.
5
Spinal cord stimulation versus reoperation for failed back surgery syndrome: a cost effectiveness and cost utility analysis based on a randomized, controlled trial.脊髓刺激与再次手术治疗失败的脊柱手术综合征:基于一项随机对照试验的成本效益和成本效用分析
Neurosurgery. 2007 Aug;61(2):361-8; discussion 368-9. doi: 10.1227/01.NEU.0000255522.42579.EA.
6
The best TcpO(2) parameters to predict the efficacy of spinal cord stimulation to improve limb salvage in patients with inoperable critical leg ischemia.预测脊髓刺激改善无法手术的严重下肢缺血患者肢体挽救疗效的最佳经皮氧分压(TcpO₂)参数。
Int Angiol. 2003 Dec;22(4):356-63.
7
Spinal cord stimulation for lower limb ischemic pain treatment.脊髓刺激用于治疗下肢缺血性疼痛。
Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2007 Aug;6(4):495-500. doi: 10.1510/icvts.2006.150185. Epub 2007 Apr 6.
8
Evaluation of healthcare utilization and health status of patients with Parkinson's disease treated with deep brain stimulation of the subthalamic nucleus.丘脑底核深部脑刺激治疗帕金森病患者的医疗利用情况和健康状况评估
J Neurol. 2002 Jun;249(6):759-66. doi: 10.1007/s00415-002-0711-7.
9
Transcutaneous oxygen tension (TcPO2) in the testing period of spinal cord stimulation (SCS) in critical limb ischemia of the lower extremities.下肢严重肢体缺血脊髓刺激(SCS)测试期的经皮氧分压(TcPO2)
Int Surg. 1999 Apr-Jun;84(2):122-8.
10
[The role of spinal cord electric stimulation in critical ischemia of the extremity].
Minerva Cardioangiol. 1996 Dec;44(12):663-7.

引用本文的文献

1
The Invasive Management of Pain: Diagnosis and New Treatment Options.疼痛的侵入性管理:诊断与新的治疗选择
Cureus. 2023 Jul 31;15(7):e42717. doi: 10.7759/cureus.42717. eCollection 2023 Jul.
2
Global Vascular Guidelines on the Management of Chronic Limb-Threatening Ischemia.全球血管指南:慢性肢体威胁性缺血的管理。
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2019 Jul;58(1S):S1-S109.e33. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2019.05.006. Epub 2019 Jun 8.
3
Global vascular guidelines on the management of chronic limb-threatening ischemia.全球血管指南:慢性肢体威胁性缺血的管理。
J Vasc Surg. 2019 Jun;69(6S):3S-125S.e40. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2019.02.016. Epub 2019 May 28.
4
Spinal cord stimulation for patients with inoperable chronic critical leg ischemia.脊髓刺激治疗无法手术的慢性临界肢体缺血患者。
World J Emerg Med. 2011;2(4):262-6. doi: 10.5847/wjem.j.1920-8642.2011.04.003.
5
Spinal cord stimulation for non-reconstructable chronic critical leg ischaemia.脊髓刺激治疗不可重建的慢性严重下肢缺血
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Feb 28;2013(2):CD004001. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004001.pub3.
6
Management of infrapopliteal peripheral arterial occlusive disease.腘动脉以下周围动脉闭塞性疾病的管理
Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med. 2012 Apr;14(2):136-48. doi: 10.1007/s11936-012-0164-y.