• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

全球血管指南:慢性肢体威胁性缺血的管理。

Global vascular guidelines on the management of chronic limb-threatening ischemia.

机构信息

Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, Calif.

Department of Vascular Surgery, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom.

出版信息

J Vasc Surg. 2019 Jun;69(6S):3S-125S.e40. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2019.02.016. Epub 2019 May 28.

DOI:10.1016/j.jvs.2019.02.016
PMID:31159978
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8365864/
Abstract

Chronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI) is associated with mortality, amputation, and impaired quality of life. These Global Vascular Guidelines (GVG) are focused on definition, evaluation, and management of CLTI with the goals of improving evidence-based care and highlighting critical research needs. The term CLTI is preferred over critical limb ischemia, as the latter implies threshold values of impaired perfusion rather than a continuum. CLTI is a clinical syndrome defined by the presence of peripheral artery disease (PAD) in combination with rest pain, gangrene, or a lower limb ulceration >2 weeks duration. Venous, traumatic, embolic, and nonatherosclerotic etiologies are excluded. All patients with suspected CLTI should be referred urgently to a vascular specialist. Accurately staging the severity of limb threat is fundamental, and the Society for Vascular Surgery Threatened Limb Classification system, based on grading of Wounds, Ischemia, and foot Infection (WIfI) is endorsed. Objective hemodynamic testing, including toe pressures as the preferred measure, is required to assess CLTI. Evidence-based revascularization (EBR) hinges on three independent axes: Patient risk, Limb severity, and ANatomic complexity (PLAN). Average-risk and high-risk patients are defined by estimated procedural and 2-year all-cause mortality. The GVG proposes a new Global Anatomic Staging System (GLASS), which involves defining a preferred target artery path (TAP) and then estimating limb-based patency (LBP), resulting in three stages of complexity for intervention. The optimal revascularization strategy is also influenced by the availability of autogenous vein for open bypass surgery. Recommendations for EBR are based on best available data, pending level 1 evidence from ongoing trials. Vein bypass may be preferred for average-risk patients with advanced limb threat and high complexity disease, while those with less complex anatomy, intermediate severity limb threat, or high patient risk may be favored for endovascular intervention. All patients with CLTI should be afforded best medical therapy including the use of antithrombotic, lipid-lowering, antihypertensive, and glycemic control agents, as well as counseling on smoking cessation, diet, exercise, and preventive foot care. Following EBR, long-term limb surveillance is advised. The effectiveness of nonrevascularization therapies (eg, spinal stimulation, pneumatic compression, prostanoids, and hyperbaric oxygen) has not been established. Regenerative medicine approaches (eg, cell, gene therapies) for CLTI should be restricted to rigorously conducted randomizsed clinical trials. The GVG promotes standardization of study designs and end points for clinical trials in CLTI. The importance of multidisciplinary teams and centers of excellence for amputation prevention is stressed as a key health system initiative.

摘要

慢性肢体严重缺血(CLTI)与死亡率、截肢和生活质量受损有关。这些全球血管指南(GVG)专注于 CLTI 的定义、评估和管理,旨在改善循证护理并突出关键研究需求。术语 CLTI 优于严重肢体缺血,因为后者意味着灌注受损的阈值值,而不是连续体。CLTI 是一种临床综合征,定义为存在外周动脉疾病(PAD),同时伴有静息痛、坏疽或下肢溃疡 >2 周。排除静脉、创伤性、栓塞性和非动脉粥样硬化病因。所有疑似 CLTI 的患者均应紧急转介至血管专科医生。准确分期肢体威胁的严重程度至关重要,基于伤口、缺血和足部感染(WIfI)分级的血管外科学会威胁肢体分类系统得到认可。客观的血流动力学测试,包括首选的趾压测试,是评估 CLTI 所必需的。循证血运重建(EBR)取决于三个独立的轴:患者风险、肢体严重程度和解剖复杂性(PLAN)。平均风险和高风险患者是根据估计的手术和 2 年全因死亡率来定义的。GVG 提出了一种新的全球解剖分期系统(GLASS),它涉及定义首选的靶动脉路径(TAP),然后估计基于肢体的通畅率(LBP),从而导致干预的三个复杂阶段。最佳血运重建策略也受到用于开放旁路手术的自体静脉可用性的影响。EBR 的建议基于最佳可用数据,等待正在进行的试验提供 1 级证据。对于严重肢体威胁和高复杂性疾病的平均风险患者,静脉旁路可能更受欢迎,而对于解剖结构较简单、中等严重程度肢体威胁或高患者风险的患者,血管内介入可能更有利。所有 CLTI 患者均应接受最佳药物治疗,包括使用抗血栓、降脂、降压和血糖控制药物,以及戒烟、饮食、运动和预防性足部护理咨询。EBR 后,建议长期进行肢体监测。非血运重建治疗(例如,脊髓刺激、气动压缩、前列腺素和高压氧)的有效性尚未确定。CLTI 的再生医学方法(例如,细胞、基因治疗)应仅限于严格进行的随机临床试验。GVG 促进了 CLTI 临床试验的研究设计和终点的标准化。强调多学科团队和卓越中心在预防截肢方面的重要性,这是一项关键的卫生系统倡议。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/776f/8365864/651ba99d2c14/nihms-1728674-f0020.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/776f/8365864/d990e8ff3291/nihms-1728674-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/776f/8365864/e530ec595281/nihms-1728674-f0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/776f/8365864/d27e3615d1b1/nihms-1728674-f0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/776f/8365864/226dbfa3502f/nihms-1728674-f0004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/776f/8365864/ac60f886ad9a/nihms-1728674-f0005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/776f/8365864/cb6b39ff69d0/nihms-1728674-f0006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/776f/8365864/21bd59ed6ba1/nihms-1728674-f0007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/776f/8365864/95b783d73e01/nihms-1728674-f0008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/776f/8365864/c5c7973cfd0e/nihms-1728674-f0009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/776f/8365864/bf7267396154/nihms-1728674-f0010.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/776f/8365864/682941695a99/nihms-1728674-f0011.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/776f/8365864/88f4a3a7c81f/nihms-1728674-f0012.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/776f/8365864/7751ebf7dad3/nihms-1728674-f0013.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/776f/8365864/b5a52798ca90/nihms-1728674-f0014.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/776f/8365864/5f3a4a9bc789/nihms-1728674-f0015.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/776f/8365864/863a6c0d09d6/nihms-1728674-f0016.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/776f/8365864/0db1d472b59b/nihms-1728674-f0017.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/776f/8365864/cbe1a35fd0de/nihms-1728674-f0018.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/776f/8365864/258e767e7d49/nihms-1728674-f0019.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/776f/8365864/651ba99d2c14/nihms-1728674-f0020.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/776f/8365864/d990e8ff3291/nihms-1728674-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/776f/8365864/e530ec595281/nihms-1728674-f0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/776f/8365864/d27e3615d1b1/nihms-1728674-f0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/776f/8365864/226dbfa3502f/nihms-1728674-f0004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/776f/8365864/ac60f886ad9a/nihms-1728674-f0005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/776f/8365864/cb6b39ff69d0/nihms-1728674-f0006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/776f/8365864/21bd59ed6ba1/nihms-1728674-f0007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/776f/8365864/95b783d73e01/nihms-1728674-f0008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/776f/8365864/c5c7973cfd0e/nihms-1728674-f0009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/776f/8365864/bf7267396154/nihms-1728674-f0010.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/776f/8365864/682941695a99/nihms-1728674-f0011.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/776f/8365864/88f4a3a7c81f/nihms-1728674-f0012.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/776f/8365864/7751ebf7dad3/nihms-1728674-f0013.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/776f/8365864/b5a52798ca90/nihms-1728674-f0014.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/776f/8365864/5f3a4a9bc789/nihms-1728674-f0015.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/776f/8365864/863a6c0d09d6/nihms-1728674-f0016.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/776f/8365864/0db1d472b59b/nihms-1728674-f0017.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/776f/8365864/cbe1a35fd0de/nihms-1728674-f0018.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/776f/8365864/258e767e7d49/nihms-1728674-f0019.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/776f/8365864/651ba99d2c14/nihms-1728674-f0020.jpg

相似文献

1
Global vascular guidelines on the management of chronic limb-threatening ischemia.全球血管指南:慢性肢体威胁性缺血的管理。
J Vasc Surg. 2019 Jun;69(6S):3S-125S.e40. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2019.02.016. Epub 2019 May 28.
2
Global Vascular Guidelines on the Management of Chronic Limb-Threatening Ischemia.全球血管指南:慢性肢体威胁性缺血的管理。
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2019 Jul;58(1S):S1-S109.e33. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2019.05.006. Epub 2019 Jun 8.
3
Early evaluation of the infrainguinal revascularization strategy selection tool of the Global Vascular Guidelines for chronic limb-threatening ischemia patients.《全球血管指南》中慢性肢体威胁性缺血患者股腘以下血管重建策略选择工具的早期评估
J Vasc Surg. 2021 Oct;74(4):1253-1260.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2021.04.034. Epub 2021 May 1.
4
A Global Vascular Guidelines-Based Bypass-Preferred Population and Their Surgical Risk Among CLTI Patients Treated With Endovascular Therapy in a Real-World Practice.在真实临床实践中接受血管内治疗的下肢慢性完全性闭塞(CLTI)患者中,基于全球血管指南的旁路优先人群及其手术风险
J Endovasc Ther. 2020 Aug;27(4):608-613. doi: 10.1177/1526602820924338. Epub 2020 May 18.
5
A systematic review and meta-analysis of revascularization outcomes of infrainguinal chronic limb-threatening ischemia.经系统回顾和荟萃分析的肢体严重缺血性慢性下肢动脉疾病血运重建结局。
J Vasc Surg. 2019 Jun;69(6S):126S-136S. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2018.01.071. Epub 2019 May 28.
6
Limb-based patency as a measure of effective revascularization for chronic limb-threatening ischemia.肢体通畅作为慢性肢体缺血性疾病有效血运重建的衡量指标。
J Vasc Surg. 2022 Oct;76(4):997-1005.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2022.04.042. Epub 2022 Jun 10.
7
A systematic review and meta-analysis of revascularization outcomes of infrainguinal chronic limb-threatening ischemia.下肢慢性肢体威胁性缺血血运重建结局的系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Vasc Surg. 2018 Aug;68(2):624-633. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2018.01.066. Epub 2018 May 24.
8
The Global Limb Anatomic Staging System is associated with outcomes of infrainguinal revascularization in chronic limb threatening ischemia.全球肢体解剖分期系统与慢性肢体威胁性缺血症的下肢血运重建治疗结局相关。
J Vasc Surg. 2021 Jun;73(6):2009-2020.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2020.12.094. Epub 2021 Feb 4.
9
Limb-Based Patency After Surgical vs Endovascular Revascularization in Patients with Chronic Limb-Threatening Ischemia.慢性肢体威胁性缺血患者手术与血管腔内血运重建术后基于肢体的通畅情况
J Endovasc Ther. 2020 Aug;27(4):584-594. doi: 10.1177/1526602820923388. Epub 2020 May 20.
10
Clinical outcomes of bypass-first versus endovascular-first strategy in patients with chronic limb-threatening ischemia due to infrageniculate arterial disease.对于因膝下动脉疾病导致慢性肢体威胁性缺血的患者,采用旁路优先与血管内优先策略的临床结果。
J Vasc Surg. 2019 Jan;69(1):156-163.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2018.05.244.

引用本文的文献

1
Peripheral artery disease.外周动脉疾病
Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2025 Sep 18;11(1):68. doi: 10.1038/s41572-025-00651-0.
2
Anatomical Predictors of Clinical Improvement After Profundoplasty in Patients with an Occluded Superficial Artery: A Pilot Study.闭塞性浅表动脉患者行股深动脉成形术后临床改善的解剖学预测因素:一项初步研究。
J Clin Med. 2025 Aug 22;14(17):5938. doi: 10.3390/jcm14175938.
3
Ultrasound Detection of Below-the-Knee Medial Arterial Calcifications in Asymptomatic Patients Is an Early Negative Predictor of Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events.

本文引用的文献

1
Lower limb events in individuals with type 2 diabetes: evidence for an increased risk associated with diuretic use.2 型糖尿病患者的下肢事件:利尿剂使用相关风险增加的证据。
Diabetologia. 2019 Jun;62(6):939-947. doi: 10.1007/s00125-019-4835-z. Epub 2019 Feb 26.
2
Cardiovascular outcome trials of glucose-lowering medications: an update.降糖药物心血管结局试验的更新。
Diabetologia. 2019 Mar;62(3):357-369. doi: 10.1007/s00125-018-4801-1. Epub 2019 Jan 3.
3
Risk of Death Following Application of Paclitaxel-Coated Balloons and Stents in the Femoropopliteal Artery of the Leg: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.
超声检测无症状患者膝下内侧动脉钙化是主要不良心血管事件的早期阴性预测指标。
Diagnostics (Basel). 2025 Sep 8;15(17):2273. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics15172273.
4
Predictive value of preoperative MELD-Na score versus APRI for postoperative outcomes after infrainguinal bypass in peripheral artery disease.术前终末期肝病模型钠评分(MELD-Na)与天冬氨酸氨基转移酶和血小板比值指数(APRI)对周围动脉疾病患者行股腘以下旁路移植术后结局的预测价值
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2025 Sep 11;410(1):270. doi: 10.1007/s00423-025-03809-2.
5
Drug-coated balloon with bailout stenting versus drug-eluting stent plus drug-coated balloon in TransAtlantic Inter-Society Consensus C and D femoropopliteal lesions: a propensity score-matched analysis.在跨大西洋协作组C型和D型股腘动脉病变中,药物涂层球囊联合补救性支架置入术与药物洗脱支架联合药物涂层球囊的比较:一项倾向评分匹配分析
Quant Imaging Med Surg. 2025 Sep 1;15(9):7727-7737. doi: 10.21037/qims-2025-367. Epub 2025 Aug 14.
6
Characteristics of Multidisciplinary Limb Preservation Teams and their Impact on Outcomes in the BEST-CLI Trial.多学科肢体保全团队的特征及其对BEST-CLI试验结果的影响。
J Vasc Surg. 2025 Aug 28. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2025.08.028.
7
Clinical Outcomes of Surgical Revascularization in Patients Presenting with Critical Limb Ischemia and Aortic Valve Stenosis.严重肢体缺血合并主动脉瓣狭窄患者外科血运重建的临床结局
J Cardiovasc Dev Dis. 2025 Jul 31;12(8):292. doi: 10.3390/jcdd12080292.
8
Risk factor management over two decades in hospitalised patients with chronic limb-threatening ischaemia with and without diabetes mellitus.20年来住院的伴有或不伴有糖尿病的慢性肢体威胁性缺血患者的危险因素管理。
Ther Adv Endocrinol Metab. 2025 Aug 22;16:20420188251362729. doi: 10.1177/20420188251362729. eCollection 2025.
9
Gut microbiota and diabetic neuropathy/peripheral artery disease: A two-sample Mendelian randomization study investigating risk factors for diabetic foot ulcers.肠道微生物群与糖尿病神经病变/外周动脉疾病:一项调查糖尿病足溃疡危险因素的两样本孟德尔随机化研究。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2025 Aug 22;104(34):e43637. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000043637.
10
Between a rock and a hard place: A case of critical limb threatening ischemia treated with deep vein arterialization.进退两难:一例采用股静脉动脉化治疗的严重肢体缺血病例
J Vasc Surg Cases Innov Tech. 2025 Jun 26;11(5):101896. doi: 10.1016/j.jvscit.2025.101896. eCollection 2025 Oct.
紫杉醇涂层球囊和支架在下肢股腘动脉中的应用死亡风险:随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2018 Dec 18;7(24):e011245. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.118.011245.
4
Survival prediction in patients with chronic limb-threatening ischemia who undergo infrainguinal revascularization.慢性肢体严重缺血患者行下肢血运重建术的生存预测。
J Vasc Surg. 2019 Jun;69(6S):137S-151S.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2018.08.169. Epub 2018 Nov 26.
5
Comparison of Ankle Pressure, Systolic Toe Pressure, and Transcutaneous Oxygen Pressure to Predict Major Amputation After 1 Year in the COPART Cohort.COPART 队列研究中踝压、收缩期趾压和经皮氧分压预测 1 年后主要截肢的比较。
Angiology. 2019 Mar;70(3):229-236. doi: 10.1177/0003319718793566. Epub 2018 Aug 16.
6
Epidemiology of peripheral artery disease in Europe: VAS Educational Paper.欧洲外周动脉疾病流行病学:VAS教育论文。
Int Angiol. 2018 Aug;37(4):327-334. doi: 10.23736/S0392-9590.18.03996-2.
7
International Variations in Amputation Practice: A VASCUNET Report.国际截肢实践差异:VASCUNET 报告。
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2018 Sep;56(3):391-399. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2018.04.017. Epub 2018 May 30.
8
A systematic review and meta-analysis of revascularization outcomes of infrainguinal chronic limb-threatening ischemia.下肢慢性肢体威胁性缺血血运重建结局的系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Vasc Surg. 2018 Aug;68(2):624-633. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2018.01.066. Epub 2018 May 24.
9
International Consortium of Vascular Registries Consensus Recommendations for Peripheral Revascularisation Registry Data Collection.国际血管登记研究联合会关于周围血管重建术登记研究数据采集的共识推荐意见。
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2018 Aug;56(2):217-237. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2018.04.006. Epub 2018 May 30.
10
Rationale and design for the Vascular Outcomes study of ASA along with rivaroxaban in endovascular or surgical limb revascularization for peripheral artery disease (VOYAGER PAD).血管结局研究的原理和设计,用于外周动脉疾病的血管内或手术肢体血运重建中与利伐沙班联合应用(VOYAGER PAD)。
Am Heart J. 2018 May;199:83-91. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2018.01.011. Epub 2018 Feb 3.