Suppr超能文献

两种全细胞脂肪酸分析方法用于区分水稻丝核菌和水稻-稻瘟病菌的比较。

Comparison of two total cellular fatty acid analysis protocols to differentiate Rhizoctonia oryzae and R. oryzae-sativae.

作者信息

Lanoiselet V M, Cother E J, Cother N J, Ash G J, Harper J D I

机构信息

Farrer Centre, School of Agricultural and Veterinary Studies, Charles Sturt University, Wagga Wagga, Australia.

出版信息

Mycologia. 2005 Jan-Feb;97(1):77-83. doi: 10.3852/mycologia.97.1.77.

Abstract

Two fatty acid analysis protocols (the MIDI and a modified MIDI method) were investigated for their utility to characterize and differentiate Rhizoctonia oryzae and R. oryzae-sativae isolates from four countries. Only the modified MIDI method permitted a clear differentiation between the two species, regardless of the isolates' country of origin. The modified MIDI method gave the most consistent and reproducible fatty acid results. The failure of the MIDI method to differentiate between R. oryzae and R. oryzae-sativae isolates suggests that the 30 minutes saponification step is insufficient to completely break the cell wall of these two species. This study demonstrated that fatty acid profiles, obtained by the modified MIDI protocol, have the potential as a diagnostic tool for both R. oryzae and R. oryzae-sativae.

摘要

研究了两种脂肪酸分析方法(MIDI法和改良的MIDI法)用于表征和区分来自四个国家的稻梨孢菌和稻-稻梨孢菌分离株的效用。无论分离株的原产国如何,只有改良的MIDI方法能够清晰地区分这两个物种。改良的MIDI方法给出了最一致且可重复的脂肪酸结果。MIDI方法无法区分稻梨孢菌和稻-稻梨孢菌分离株,这表明30分钟的皂化步骤不足以完全破坏这两个物种的细胞壁。本研究表明,通过改良的MIDI方案获得的脂肪酸谱有潜力作为稻梨孢菌和稻-稻梨孢菌的诊断工具。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验