Azhar A S, Habib H S
International Medical Center, P.O. Box 2172, Jeddah, 21451, Saudi Arabia.
Pediatr Cardiol. 2006 Mar-Apr;27(2):234-7. doi: 10.1007/s00246-005-1122-1.
The objective of this study was to determine the differences between neonatologists and pediatric cardiologists with regards to the initial assessment of neonatal heart murmur and to evaluate the role of echocardiography in this group of patients. During a period of 1 year, all neonates with heart murmur seen in pediatric cardiology consultation from neonatal intensive care units at the Children Hospital of Eastern Ontario and Ottawa General Hospital were included in this study. Neonates with heart murmur were initially evaluated clinically by a neonatologist and the most likely clinical diagnosis was recorded. This was followed by similar evaluation and assessment by the pediatric cardiologist, who did not know the result of the previous assessment. Echocardiography diagnosis was considered the gold standard for the accurate diagnosis in the two groups, and it was done for all patients. For the neonatologists, the sensitivity to detect a pathological murmur was 78% and the specificity was 33%; the positive predictive value was 77% and the negative predictive value was 37%. For the pediatric cardiologists, the accuracy of the clinical examination showed a sensitivity of 83% in detecting a pathological murmur and a specificity of 25%; the positive predictive value was 80% and the negative predictive value was 29%. There was no significant difference between the two groups. Certified neonatologists are able to assess the significance of neonatal heart murmurs well as pediatric cardiologists, although echocardiogram is still needed to reach the accurate diagnosis of congenital heart disease in neonates even if a pediatric cardiologist is consulted.
本研究的目的是确定新生儿科医生和儿科心脏病专家在新生儿心脏杂音初始评估方面的差异,并评估超声心动图在这组患者中的作用。在1年的时间里,本研究纳入了安大略东部儿童医院和渥太华综合医院新生儿重症监护病房儿科心脏病会诊中见到的所有有心脏杂音的新生儿。有心脏杂音的新生儿首先由新生儿科医生进行临床评估,并记录最可能的临床诊断。随后由儿科心脏病专家进行类似的评估和检查,该专家不知道先前评估的结果。超声心动图诊断被认为是两组准确诊断的金标准,所有患者均进行了此项检查。对于新生儿科医生来说,检测病理性杂音的敏感性为78%,特异性为33%;阳性预测值为77%,阴性预测值为37%。对于儿科心脏病专家来说,临床检查的准确性显示检测病理性杂音的敏感性为83%,特异性为25%;阳性预测值为80%,阴性预测值为29%。两组之间无显著差异。尽管即使咨询了儿科心脏病专家,仍需要超声心动图来准确诊断新生儿先天性心脏病,但获得认证的新生儿科医生能够像儿科心脏病专家一样很好地评估新生儿心脏杂音的意义。